TAGUIG CITY GOVERNMENT, HON. MA. LAARNI CAYETANO, in her capacity as the (former) Mayor of the City of Taguig, and ATTY. MARIANITO MIRANDA, in his capacity as the (former) Treasurer of the City of Taguig v. SERENDRA CONDOMINIUM CORPORATION (consolidated with CTA AC. Case No. 230)
REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES COURT OF TAX APPEALS QUEZON CITY SECOND DIVISION TAGUIG CITY GOVERNMENT, CTA AC No. 229 HON. MA. LAARNI CAYETANO, (RTC Civil Case No. 74669) in her capacity as the (former) Mayor of the City of Taguig, and ATTY. MARIANITO MIRANDA, in his capacity as the (former) Treasurer of the City of Taguig, Petitioners, - versus- SERENDRA CONDOMINIUM CORPORATION, Respondent. x------------------------------------------x SERENDRA CONDOMINIUM CTA AC No. 230 CORPORATI ON, (RTC Civil Case No. 74669) Petitioner, Members: CASTANEDA, JR., Chairperson, and BACORRO-VILLENA, JJ. - versus - TAGUIG CITY GOVERNMENT, HON. MA. LAARNI CAYETANO, in her capacity as the (former) Mayor of the City of Taguig, and ATTY. MARIANITO MIRANDA, in his capacity as the (former) Treasurer of the Promu lgated: City of Taguig, NOV 19 2020 ~ Resp on den ts. X--------------------------------------------------------------1--7-----g-~.-1-6--~~~~---x RESOLUTION ?z-
RESOLUTION CTA AC Nos. 229 & 230 Taguig City Government, et. al. v. Serendra Condominium Corporation CASTANEDA, JR., J.: For resolution of this Court is Taguig City Government (TCG) et. al. 's Motion for Reconsideration (of the Decision dated 10 September 2020) filed on October 7, 2020 with Serendra Condominium Corporation's (SCC) Comment/Opposition (To Respondents Motion for Reconsideration dated 7 October 2020). TCG et. al. assail the Decision dated September 10, 2020 (the " Assailed Decision'') of this Court partially granting their Petition for Partial Review docketed as CTA AC No. 229 as well as the Petition for Review filed by Serendra Condominium Corporation docketed as CTA AC No. 230. In their Motion, TCG et. al. seek reconsideration of the Assailed Decision based on the following grounds: "I. GROUNDS FOR THE MOTION A. THE HONORABLE COURT COMMITTED REVERSIBLE ERROR IN FINDING SCC NOT SUBJECT TO LBT AND BUSINESS PLATE/STICKER FEE AS SCC HAD ACTUALLY ENGAGED IN PROFIT-MAKING ACTIVITIES. B. TH E HONORABLE COURT COMMITTED REVERSIBLE ERROR IN FINDING THAT THE ElF IS IMPOSABLE ONLY ON ENTITIES ENGAGED IN BUSINESS, THUS, RULING THAT SCC IS NOT SUBJECT TO THE ElF BEING NOT ENGAGED IN BUSINESS. C. THE HONORABLE COURT COMMITTED REVERSIBLE ERROR IN FINDING TCG, ETAL LIABLE FOR COSTS OF SUIT. " In its Comment/Opposition, SCC maintains that it is not engaged in business, hence, not liable for local business taxes (LBT) and business plate/sticker fee. sec also asserts that it is not liable for the environmental impact fee (ElF) as it is only imposed on entities ?z-
RESOLUTION CfA AC Nos. 229 & 230 Taguig City Government, et. al. v. Serendra Condominium Corporation engaged in business. Finally, SCC contends that it is not liable to pay the costs of suit. After judicious evaluation of the arguments raised by the parties and the relevant facts gathered from the records vis-a-vis the applicable laws, rules and regulations, and jurisprudence on the matter, this Court finds no substantial matter much less any compelling reason that warrants the modification let alone the reversal of the Assailed Decision. Truth be told, TCG et. al.'s arguments in their Motion for Reconsideration are mere restatements, if not repetition, of those presented in their previous pleadings, and which this Court already sufficiently discussed and passed upon in the Assailed Decision. The underlying reasons why TCG et. al.'s arguments are considered unmeritorious were fully explained in the Assailed Decision and need not be reiterated here. TCG et. aI.'s Motion for Reconsideration is devoid of any merit and should accordingly be denied. WH EREFORE, Taguig City Government et. al. 's Motion for Reconsideration (of the Decision dated 10 September 2020) is DENIED for lack of merit. SO ORDERED. a~c.as-~~ /~ fuANITO C. CASTANED~, JR. Associate Justice !CONCUR: ' ~ -VILLENA
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.