CTA Case No. 2195 (Decision)

t.! l ~>l IC 0 I . J BlLIPPl~ES r ( 1., !-{ 1 1F �.\ x AP.P A L8 QU�Z N ~ , ' <.; � � � U' , t. ~ ------- -~ D t; () .l .. ' u lc t\C ... � l' ve J ' ~ .it i .:;..� I h ' \; 3 0 I'J .16 � 1 ~ .1 p1 - t l "' '� .... /') j~ 1\! l n u O~� , , i vwl t. \,; ' r b tr rt t c " . ;:) u �n !1. J. � 1 �. '' 5 ;� �' ,.: 14 5

~.1 l (; t 3, l. 1 1 l �n ). 1 � � n hi n� i6 �v�v �t ' D 1.! m ' l v nu � . ':1. �� ' ay i J "J7J ( r � l� ) ' i: I !' 14 6

DJ...(~ ,~. .., I. . � ... l ,5 I.., I (; ,~o;;J,; f~\.J . t! 3 t he t ~; rm. ".L�. �ccchnt- :Pt:�' i . \. 't.na mbe:l' . !od a., 14 7

4 .. 14 8

!:l () . .... t; ! .. , , 1 1t 149

l�ECIc�.. Hor!, -tm . 219c; 6 150

f,J' .... .... 7 0 f u ~1 31 . i 1' t c1 f 151

'v. <d. J. 11' l � � w 152