CTA Case No. 1196 (Resolution)
REPUnT TCZ OF THF. PHTLIPPTN ES cou 1t1 , ~, TAX APREALS ' QUEZON CITY UNION I NS'lJRANCE SOCIETY OF C. I . A. CANTO! , LTD., . CASE NO . 119 6 PP t itioner, - versus - COM/Vli SSIONER OF INTERNAL R VSNUE , Re s ponde nt. X- - - - - - - - - - - - - X / R E S 0 L UT I 0 N For th e r e,a s on t he r ein st a t ed and it appearing that respondent and his a tto rn e~hav e ex pressed their wr it t e n confo r mi ty , pe titioner ' s 11 Moti on To Wit hd raw Pe tit i on For ~v ie w" i s her eby gr anted , � S 0; DERED. Que z on Ci t y , January 11 , 1966 . - LO D. REYES , S r. re siding J udge ROMA J M. UWALI Ass ociate Judge
More in CTA Resolutions
- CTA Case No. 1395 (Resolution)(CTA Case No. 1395)
- CLASSIC FINE FOODS PHILIPPINES, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 9391)
- KEYENCE PHILIPPINES, INC. v COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 11453)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. LINDE PHILIPPINES, INC. (formerly, CONSOLIDATED INDUSTRIAL GASES, INC.),(CTA Case No. EB 2194)
- TOLEDO POWER COMPANY v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 9465)
- BETHLEHEM HOLDINGS, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 9789)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. WHOLESOME FOODS, INC.,(CTA Case No. EB 2075)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. RAMON Y. MENDOZA(CTA Case No. EB 2356)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.