jurisprudence[ G. R. No. 40090. May 08, 1934 ] 1934-05-08

[ G. R. No. 40090. May 08, 1934 ]

[ G. R. No. 40090. May 08, 1934 ]

G. R. No. 40090

[ G. R. No. 40090. May 08, 1934 ]

SUSANA VAZQUEZ, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLANT, VS. ENRIQUE MARTIN, DEFENDANT AND APPELLEE.

D E C I S I O N

J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT

This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________19th________day of ________April________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;

By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Iloilo________, dated the __________31st__________ day of __________March____________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-three____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed with costs in this instance against the plaintiff-appellant.

It is further ordered that __________the appellee__________ recover from __________ the appellant___________ the sum of P__40.00__, as costs.

Want an analysis of this document?

Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.