CTA Case No. 4103 (Resolution)
�.:-..UP.UC 0 P ~'\IE f'fili.l~f)tfll1"� t.' OURT OF T ..X .APP.EA Lfl Qt.~�--~U~ C 1 .,...; G~UENT ..'ACIFIC CAPITAL INVES't 1EtH COHPORATIOd ICITICORP I~VESTMEN1 PBit.IPP!.lF.S), Petitioner, - versus - C.T.A . CASE NO . 4103 THE COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE t Rt>spondent . X- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - y J E S 0 L U ~ I 0 !~ Actinrr on the tll�1otion fo attar"''" Pe ition Fo Rev 1 e� " 1 f �1.1 e d by pet i t i o e r on Feb r u "': r y 1 q , 1 q n . 0 n the ground th tl1e assessment for deficien y 1nco '" ta' includin~ intAr a involved herein h~d alr ady been s ttled throu h co~nromise pursuant to ~xecutive Order No.~�� , 1t h petitioner paying '"1e mount of' ?567,11q.�76, a:s full pay e~t thar~of, and witb the co1for �ity of resDon ent, the s2id otion is hereby GRAN;E � Accordin ly, let the petition for revi t be cons i d �e d 1i h r a m ., n d t '� is case <! e ; =ned c l o s c d n d t".:lrmi .ated . SO OJ\DERE.D. 1oss. l 1e7.on City,
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.