CTA Case No. 929 (Resolution)
l ,�. aEPUIUC OF THI PHlLIPPINES I COURT'OF TAX APPEALS .... :-'Oqi)UQJ ,. CITY ,.. , ' ) ' �~, ... CUUSI..;LiiJ. ~'.L.;u 111W:.:S, INC., i'etitioner, - versus - t,. . '.'.l -�, \" t ~~ ' .. .. ._ - - .., X ll .... X. - - - - K .. :-; 0 L U 'l' I .J :J nist.cucive ;.:o~tpces~ cr s~ttler;,ent by the Hur~.au of l.ntc.rnal : :t::v~nu'" , ~ i 1t.: l;;t.~urt rc:..;olvon to deny ~�ctt- tioner':; unvl:!r if if,.;t.l rnotion f <1r rcco :�.f\iucr~ tion filed ~1 ~~vcmber 19, l~ul anG to maintain its order GL uctober 1~, 1Ya2 di~~i ~ ~ins thi~ cn~c for f ilurc of lr'eti~io:1cr tv prcsecuto �J.ts a~:.p~al. �-'U;.;~on l!i ty, ..r~nuary ~, l~ i: J. !. .... '� 1 rl I \ ~
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.