[ G. R. No. 39286. June 02, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 39286. June 02, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 39286
[ G. R. No. 39286. June 02, 1934 ]
FAUSTA SISMAET ET AL., PLAINTIFFS AND APPELLEES, VS. MARCELO ABIS ET AL., DEFENDANT AND APPELLANT.
D E C I S I O N
J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________17th________day of ________May________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of __________Cavite__________, dated the__________25th______________ day of __________October_________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-two____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed with costs against the appellant.
It is further ordered that __________the appellees__________ recover from __________the appellant __________the sum of P__40.00__, as costs.
More in SC Decisions
- [ G.R. No. 124166. November 16, 1999 ](376 Phil. 216)
- [ G.R. No. L-48724. August 29, 1988 ](247-A Phil. 46)
- G.R. No. 269249, October 24, 2023
- G.R. No. 143514, August 08, 2002
- [ G.R. No. 153021. March 10, 2004 ](469 Phil. 223)
- [ G.R. Nos. 84462-63. March 29, 1989 ](253 Phil. 461; 86 OG No. 44, 8175 (October 29, 1990))
- [ G.R. No. 39864. December 08, 1933 ](G.R. No. 39864)
- [ G.R. No. 178221. December 01, 2010 ](651 Phil. 137)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.