CTA Case No. 1191 (Decision)
'. j \.. 4 � ' I � , ~~ ~- --. I ,.-~ � � c . o. 1191 � I" 1 f � 1 0l ol r� 1t 0 7 1952 . 1 joeo1 � al - 1 0� io 1 19 95 ' 195 ( � 1) ' cl - ot 67'� 0 111 - 1 0 he ! ll pi 0 0 11 p- r 1- llo lo cl 1 31 , 1953, c t 0 y , 52 1 0 � ( � ). ; it 12 8
� 1191 c 1 hi �
CI � 11 1 CT r () �� b �n ( � 5) . ( I r 2, 196 � r� 0 f 0 - ). �l - ', � , a1 1p1 t ri (1) X fo
- �1 � - t 0 � 2' 19 ) , �~�"'..,... , 31, 19 1) 15 7 b. 2 t 0 01 , r cr1 � l ( p 0l n1 (5) � . !' 131
.. � 11 1 5 or � ' 1n to 1 0 to 1, ( � �� � ., � � 5 1I C! � oll. � � 12 1 131, ' 1 r io c � � 0 � ot 1 � �� 13 6 ril ' ,1960; � Coll. � �� � 5, 2 ' 1961 . } l 1 lle (5) 0 X1 - � �v� ' 1957 ) 0 1 0 � h t 0 x. ~1 1 ot 0h 8 ic lo 132
I c � 11 9 1 ot hi c "'.I. deductien i i 1 h 1 or.,; n' ue 1 0l t h 1� ic ncy � t� , 0 'r h ex . c1 1 t r 1 c- c p 1 ... 1 3 1 0"'"0 ol 0 ol t G. � � 11 75 , � ' - c l c . .J g 0 to n ... 1 0 t c.r 1n L( th i t .l c� ci p1 r v nr 1 h r~ oll .i - ci 1 t 1:) 5 1r '7 0 1tu ~1 1 of c' '1 )I 1.33
� �1 7 0� ) . � l' ;) c
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.