[ G. R. No. 40161. May 08, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 40161. May 08, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 40161
[ G. R. No. 40161. May 08, 1934 ]
CLARO M. RECTO, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLEE, VS. DOROTEO T. MACAUAN, DEFENDANT AND APPELLANT.
D E C I S I O N
J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________20th________day of ________April________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Rizal________, dated the __________29th__________ day of __________May____________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-three____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed with the costs in the instance against the defendant-appellant.
It is further ordered that __________the plaintiff-appellee__________ recover from __________the defendant-appellant__________ the sum of P__40.00__, as costs.
More in SC Decisions
- G.R. No. 123238, September 22, 2008
- [ G.R. No. 110637. October 07, 1994 ](307 Phil. 539)
- [ G.R. No. 81163. September 26, 1988 ](248 Phil. 205)
- G.R. No. 118889, March 23, 1998
- [ A.M. NO. 00-2-65-RTC. February 15, 2005 ](491 Phil. 485)
- G.R. NO. 160805, November 24, 2006
- [ G.R. NO. 157919. January 30, 2007 ](542 Phil. 355)
- G.R. NO. 152149, April 25, 2006
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.