CTA Case No. 2174 (Decision)
'� ~EPU!ILIC OF THE PHILIPPINEI � COURT OF TAX APPE.A.LI QU.EZON CITY � , "' . ), "' '* � -� - - -- .. .. ... .... .... .... c.n. ... n ... .�.. / ... f\ f\1 ~~� 'K \ E ... -i. 0 ~ i " "" e sl. n .. 1' t w�. \. e ... .{. z., 'I A� 1 t � u. ' ti ot� .... c.' r 1 t i (, . r .. .l '! 1 . � ~ ~ ,11 l ,.{Jt i r 9) 233 .'
\ �, P' � � 'I �� r , , "--' 95 , aJ.t a � ir ' - ta llt: . , .aJJ l i t b Pl'v r 1. ul - �it>rt. f.) e it � .l.tH 0 , ' d."..'. � \,i 1 r tha:. � lt ''t: 42 .!.' .~ 1 �� Ul:'l 1;~' r ; i -P..t' 1 .r i 1 1 l- r' ~ 0 ~� � t $ �
�\ . - .. ,fl wtt te Q .1.4 t: oc \;, ... - J. IL i .is c , "" .. ot ~ l .h 1 t Qfl .e �ti ely , r \.i � .J . .,"r2 ., It �t t l. . u h ;., r � 1-. ti-l' 'UtiCU ~ 3t 19 � ; , p. 1t1 r. r , ~ J ., c .r G 1:� l~ ~ J. l"U r g..,. J'il~i p ~ :1 l .l. 't, c 4 U1J. l J. .t .. . 1t1 ;.;u "' r u' .. <:..l ... � -� X: Pi' �. 1 t1 �. t .('{; l t t4l' ' ' r. n' :1 11 235 .I
Q �. - ... h 1 r t 1 r e't t r � p-r nt y, r
.I - ...I ..... . 'I'. - ' ' . 1le � u1" r I~ . \ ""'"' r tL 'Ell_ 1 _ior t , t1C . .. 1 ,., t.. .'. .,. 01'1 "* 1 by , ne .; 'A .l.;l . 1 (; ~ t� . ... .,..;n � .. t � "f l l -~ J:,t:f. 1 .Vl~O JC:I "". t. fP nc . ' I.l t. .I .': 1' .e 1 c- 'J sol 1,7' 'JU ' t +"' . tit;Y-.1..V J. '.. . t t an a ' l';j ' .. " l.'t. lt �t ... "'~ r tQ t oot.:.l 1w n r 1 ' b h.e c ty C<l pr fHl 0 a !"fan b c.r I �t ~ th 1~ \11) rt> tn c t� t 0 ... .I t � rt" ti r () 237 '1
... -� t ... r �r � u (,: ) l � ... � .) � c � ..... .} l � f t
... � :ct17 , x ov n ,..h OI I c o � :..nc 1 -~<' rn n ' � .;, �' c -� � 1;-.2 ' t ...;.. 1. - 3 , 1-- . Ll t in . I C �,u; �<. � tL nc i if' nf h �.d i :C 0 � � l. . .l � I n, s' ' : our n n 4... � J. .c � c o: �
' .t \ ll ). - .... 1 rc t ,.., t 1J � ) :. t l t1<1 � ,..; -tu t � ~ r. �� ' tbe ur hi ,~~s �et. t.i~,).ot~ t ' t : u..s- ht. ~ ..W.ll ~0 . r 'llv Ci l vt ...l l ~ 0~ ~ l �..a �� l ~..oa 1- e r . .l� - ~ . ~L J; '1.' J nr. .,.\/ ~0 � ... '. it; 1' o.i.' ~lvW tni.s on"' '. c t ' a 'u .IL l" 240
I .... -~ �~7 ..... . .... e �.�. 1 J, fl ~. c.; t p ients � b.~ t ~ ~ i t. r ( . '.u ... i t l~.,;.j � l tl ' th u .' � 241
' ' � l 't� .... 7 ~i.>" � I~ LeI t� .1.:! ' 1 . J.> .. rl . It-o � ' ll X X e- -~ ~C1~ e r- . t..1 (1 ~~ 2 4 2
l- re , unu Oh . :r!t e ti . � r, f . it �. '!.< t; .~ ~�)I 1.. � ". �'.f'U.JJ.U. '1 i~ 2 4 3
More in CTA Decisions
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. TAGANITO MINING CORPORATION(CTA Case No. EB 559)
- SAMAR-ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 6697)
- PHILIPPINE MINING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION v. THE COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE AND THE OIC-ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, LARGE TAXPAYERS SERVICE, IN THEIR OFFICIAL CAPACITIES AS OFFICERS OF THE BUREAU OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 1900)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. SAN ROQUE POWER CORPORATION(CTA Case No. EB 657)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. THE COURT OF TAX APPEALS-SPECIAL THIRD DIVISION and KILUSANG MAGKAIBIGAN MULTI-PURPOSE COOPERATIVE(CTA Case No. EB 2060)
- NOKIA (PHILIPPINES), INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 2238)
- REMA TIP TOP PHILIPPINES, INC., v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 9836)
- FIRST SUMIDEN CIRCUITS, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 8924)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.