CTA Case No. 504 (Decision)
n � ~v, - r~o1 t~l 1 � - -n � - ... - - h f I ,� na h � 1 -----~--���- ~� l
- � 2� ----- � 2. 2 7 .1 � ( -2 . � i, :t
� -- ut y fi c d c- p 1 ic � t ;h 1y pu c f .. f � c t p- ;: 4 9
.- .. .. n 't!"" h> t 0 r- or , 1 n ~h( 1 nd t � ~. r � t'J!)~ . �c.., . �t ----"'! ha tr to h 5 , ~ 1. �, f net � .h ctl � � cha 1 . ~n w t y i fl 0 y y ( Ui!Q n c iti n - c 0 . i io (:! ... .. t th 1 ... � !t n e t !r
-- I ' � .. 5 - �1 r 1 i c Y� 1 t f 1 1 ci c- � n :ri n �� il p n 1 � n1 0 � i c �� ti n i n i� � t'
� -- nh ll cl l� n n l �1 rh ... ...,.. � l 1 .. in l ... n 1.. 7. n- t. h cc ol in � e .c ion- .. � 52
� -7 y yt 0 r 0. X' in y ( t t v. c. � l � l 7, f � � L� y 7. 1 5 ) iti th ln 1 g i 1 .u cu t �� d n 1 s � 1 n� ( � l 7 . .�1 . � p 1 .. I ti c th i n y, i JO - Co t 1c � ith u ct nl n hdt f u - r 1 n f J �, t r �w
it '
� � ue 1 c tn t - n1 i f .r -c.. 2 l tc f n c d f T l d 1 :f � �c n� � innl� a h
� -- X ti n tl f y 0 rn p t t h u n fo:r. r. ht f d r X i nt s �tfr lC n- 1n v d i d1v n- f f h t t 11 c ic c y 1d T cri � IU h - t t tb �t t r tu f 1 1 ~~ fi 1 ' ch , n r l ~~ fil on 1 �0 oll c 0 1t y fr c1 t � 19 � fi - t r vi 11 . 1� i ft v d th c�n y i t� of i s f th .1 \� Th1 is v c c- in lv ~1 i li l �- t t cti n .( c ). n c6 , t
/ t t 1 � �I. � �� re t n n �� 57
"0
�4 -- r fp p o. hi inco c u ... in r � 0 x- i ch 1 9 un ht2y r r n1 c ~n -ndi � � nly h lf- j th ilit f 11 X � or n it 1 h � nh of c 1 ti h "' n u 0 s i f ~in t i nr f i �� en s or i in 0 t n 1 v .. ct. s0 t � e v lid"t c nt IV n ly t. ut � h i t. I 1 � t� i .n t ror in th d ei i � tit � itt co t a n ,i J nu y ? � 2.
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.