[ G. R. No. 40811. August 15, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 40811. August 15, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 40811
[ G. R. No. 40811. August 15, 1934 ]
VICTORIO N. CRUZ, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLEE, VS. CHINA INSURANCE & SURETY COMPANY, INC, DEFENDANT AND APPELLANT.
D E C I S I O N
V. ALBERT, CLERK, SUPREME COURT, P.I.
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________28th________day of ________July________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of __________Manila_________, dated the _________24th__________ day of __________August_________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-three____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed with costs of this instance against the appellant.
It is further ordered that __________the appellee__________ recover from _________the appellant__________ the sum of P__40.00__, as costs.
More in SC Decisions
- [ G.R. No. L-32383. September 30, 1982 ](202 Phil. 478; 80 OG No. 8, 1126 (February 20, 1984))
- G.R. No. 121739, June 14, 1999
- [ G R. No. L-16572. February 27, 1965 ]
- G.R. No. 189297, June 03, 2013
- G.R. No. 137564, March 30, 2001
- [ G.R. No. 74513. August 19, 1988 ](247 Phil. 621)
- [ G.R. No. L-35401. January 20, 1976 ](161 Phil. 56; 72 OG 4964 (May, 1976))
- G.R. No. 141820, July 09, 2008
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.