CTA Case No. 131 (Decision)
J ~ /' REPUBLIC OF THE PIDLIPPI 1E COURT OF TAX APPEA.LS MANlLA , c. r�� -� X � - � � � - - � � � � - �X ; ' p slo er o o. 1747. t � f e1 � I~ � fo ty- 187 � co - � 91 �
....... J. . ;;, 31 C.-1 - � -2 ""' n d to t (; ,c 0 fl "5") f a c v r .... by bill ad in~ -" . nd 2 ) �f a coem; rcial in oiee {2Jehibit u ,0 ...1.. tt ~ * '*) a j G~ttif e e 0 0 . it ' '� ad a tt') ~ onsu a ce ) f;. � l i:t c ..o. ~... g ~ 1 ...... nd . "} -hie: th '"�1 nt as:: 42 case oi .~u bGt' tc 1.:~ i i i � an- a ig �O i e"" n L .... ll2 pon ~a: CU"'t.O. n to c s la 101 i c .il ana r t e , -ti t:iorP th ti $ (' ee J.H~ ; o. � A it n r i I K'! 188
c. ... 1 ... """ c .t: c ly th - � . l ... t ) u ., h on- o~ ca. 5 ' ,i 2 .rrty...nine 2 ) :J{ t, nt.:Lr fox .... {) (; ru �e boot Wtd:' t it ei.f ct 0 �~e:r ��ic ..,.t 0 t .\ {1 s . ly !$ t.l"' th - hi ~ nt of saict -;,-o s (l boot } i n rrcr., 1.ohe p t.ition ,... e �!. "!l d � po ~it>l fo t.t t. r on tt � n . o r 'll#';U'' . 00 "i c �l '0 h :i"J ots or la e ru:! t"lap X: ~ io~1, t t �t t' 0 cr , lt. on J y ~;:) . l:J!i4. ls ~ 0'1 y s u.l �t or o. i l;,pl rc�l c f t nt t1 nk J' se of \ and �!iecti up to u S:J 9!:14) ., 1:?. of t J ndic. l� (, l l s. ' l' ... () � r ~ r ly". IW 189
� ( .re r n n�d i � 9} ,rti �r ar .-,J. an 1 r or {� � t s. "' Exti �c d "7 J� b irrt. i fo :rs. "'tl 1 2 c�lls or ar ru� v ~~ .d onl. .. i : !'C 1 � SC or ndie~.t iff;! :6! �d �a of in... lusio r ~m:i cl ... e . 0 ~r b 0 1! u ... us of ,ine s.- an .X(: 1 ' e ...l l o~; ,n �i. y~ o... 1 '' .ta an~ cnilol:' n .. su to tt z of t. n {13} 9$ o'f :ruu.o � 0 ts ;.n n or e r 1el -f u ldij ' t ci.a '.} ... �n i ' �i re~-p~ct 0 th ~� ~a"' .;.i.. t.hG f r t.) pt r ont n �o 't.:: t i oul l for e i!< ro:r , i th i n � 1') 0 c! s con ,ti"'Jh his l~tt~r is tli"t .~... \~ �~ . . tior1 Ci the .r +'�I ..all l~fl~: 5 ' j, ..... t in t.1 totes. c ij,f r n� � a�� .'}.. l � . n.. tt- ) I� ') i f 190
t it t ll n Co � !ora iOt '"' "' .C. 1: r. . c 1/~ 191
.- � � l?i 192
-- . � � len ~ t ic i i 1 ; � �._ l � 'I t t t< . � 1r he al t at of good l � In � ut i h. � " 'f ' � y c $t j fo2 � 193
1 -� 0 f l � � .l 5� 19 4 IP
�' ; .. Iff 195
More in CTA Decisions
- SMART COMMUNICATIONS, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 6120)
- CTA Case No. 1503 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 1503)
- EAST WEST BANKING CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 7035)
- PHILIPPINE NATIONAL BANK v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 5792)
- PHILIPPINE AIRLINES, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE and COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS(CTA Case No. 8514)
- CTA Case No. 5752 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 5752)
- GETZ PHARMA (PHILS.), INC. v. HON.COMMISSIONER KIM S. JACINTO-HENARES, HON. ALFREDO V. MISAJON, Regional Director, Revenue Region No. 7 and HON. JOSEPHINE S. VIRTUCIO, Regional District Officer, Revenue District No. 43-A, East Pasig(CTA Case No. EB 2435)
- PHILIPPINE AIRLINES, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 9435)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.