CTA Case No. 2364 (Resolution)
�~ OP "\'HC f'fJILIPPtN"~ -.:ou r OF TAX ~rP.EAU Q\J.IIlltOJC CJ f'Y APO CEM.:.. 11' c 0 I TIO ~. p ti ion r. ru C.T� � c, 3E NO. 2364 COMMI :.> o:i I 0 E OF EV NU "� - - - - Re pondent. X -- -- - - X 0 L u' I 0 ct1ng on th 11 otion or 01 1 sal An /Or Clo 1nQ Of h C �e" fil d by coun el for p t1t1oner on July 3. 1987 on th groun th t th def1 1 ncy 1 s t X 11 bili i involv d b r in w r t 1 d thro qh CO prO iS 1 vith p titioner d liV rinq eo.ooo 0 CJS Of ce ent as videnc d by th lett r of the Bur au of Intern 1 v nu to p tition r d t d May 14. 1986, n th re ing no obj ction on th p rt of r pondent. the s id tion is h r by o. ccordinqly, tet th p ition for review be dis- mi nd this c c con i ( r d cl d nd r in ted. D D. u zon City, Metro anil 1 Julv 1~ 1 8 7. 21 8
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.