[ G. R. No. 39683. June 01, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 39683. June 01, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 39683
[ G. R. No. 39683. June 01, 1934 ]
INTERNATIONAL HARVESTER COMPANY OF THE PHILIPPINES (FORMERLY MACLEOD & CO.), PLAINTIFF AND APPELLEE VS. FRANCISCA RAENA VDA. DE VILLANUEAVA, ETC., DEFENDANT AND APPELLANT.
D E C I S I O N
J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________15th________day of ________May________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of _________Manila__________, dated the__________22nd______________ day of __________November_________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-two____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, reversed and the complaint dismissed, with costs in both instances against the plaintiff-appellee.
It is further ordered that ___________the appellant__________ recover from _____________the appellee__________ the sum of P__99.00__, as costs.
More in SC Decisions
- [ G.R. No. 116801. April 06, 1995 ](313 Phil. 358)
- G.R. No. 155206, October 28, 2003
- G.R. NO. 148196, September 30, 2005
- [ G.R. No. L-20108. December 28, 1964 ]
- [ G.R. No. 192737. April 25, 2012 ](686 Phil. 1139)
- [ G.R. No. 3356. October 21, 1908 ](G.R. No. 3356)
- G.R. Nos. 97652-53, October 19, 1999
- [ G.R. No. 213400. August 04, 2021 ](909 Phil. 567; 120 OG No. 17, 3647 (April 22, 2024))
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.