CTA Case No. 1707 (Decision)
...,�� ' , ~EPU BI.IC OF THE PBtLIPP...r !:f COURT OF TAX APPEA.Lf QUEZON CITY � � - J. 1
.. ' � l' U$ l.c: . lev t' e ... ' . nc � f i t 11 - r t t. .. .) y , 'rt, la t' ,, l .t v � b h 0 t in n ::1 , .1. 1 28
S' o;, .. c~ 17 .. � ) � � ��
� 1 .. 8. Jt ' ~ .X X :X., *H-2+2, 1n e �� Ut'l... � )' r- l 7 o1' t r -.-1. �~o . 1'0 ft-1 stien at 1 2'\"l:;""tt ..,, n';i� 1' '"' Jto'.ll-t~ )-'1' i J: t . C.h } 0 ~8 tlrt t ~0 � 0 . d n' J :r 1 1,' e ' .:!, 3 -0
� � t7 7 1?~ ' l ' .... 1 31
.) ,.... . 77 d ,1f t o. r ~�� . r J 1:~, 1 G' t 1" ~ h 1 ., . II (.'2�1 .. 2. :3 .r..,Or!<.,. nt n1. er ), ~4 - � u sub!d. , t d I) h Cou :Pal ~ or t r.z 1 1 1 ?e to Q ~ld- oa 1 '
J;BC:t Sl:Oli ... TA � 1,.$ , i' � 17 7 ' t .. !l- to g1ft ti l .. r tion t � '- gi t nt i. 1 r- ., 111 ,II. ( t.
I � ' �� � 1 t � � � � � f
In tbt~: el~ nt t b p~~sent to t t~an- sf~r- of �thtr ~� <w rt7 d n� ,t " ~ollowtn t c .. JJtt:n la concept i:md 'l>t cr rovi::~io ~ r rtio~ 125 . ef ou .;1rt1 Cod decl r1ng b t � &1ft o.r .. 3S
.... � � t11 � r t r .. 1.1. � 1) "
� 1 t !'1 t . tf h 1 1 1: r 1 t �b her � ; t� :~ ��00 �r D. ) d 0 Q banl:in t:'Q' 1 \l t no � .. �� ..iJI :tuas eo pr- �� r 37
� 1 t ... * to , �1 . . .. ) � 1� lild u t (3) lt~t in y ot � 17U3 , 11 0]1 . . 1? l..
* 1? l t { 1 39
� � 't1l1 � :1 ... r f 1 t ,t 0 t t ~et � '� .i � It sa.i� � i ti t 40
.. r . t .l �� 1t. f )� t of :ll (.,. ,I h1ldf t to tb lu� 1 1. 5 � of .th� �~ id thr ) lo �S,,7t 5. ,J n not �1 l+,J 2 , 5 � Ho e low r ai"l-"n'f. _y 1"i.Un b. l f b l titi n r ei . t olv i l t !� t1 .
1 .., t r tn t� 1 n � �
� nvol 'Q �. �:1 t tt� U: 00 . 't n ' 23, 19132, ar er, ... en fl b be � "' s c . - 11~ at n, tol o� h .43
,s r h n tt ' .. t n .l � 8 r n4 0 d l1n en ino .7 0. 3 � �9', . � Oi tl r � ' {t.1t tax 1 un~tt � 1 ntt , ~ '! ap �11 t c f li".k j 11 ' 1 1 7 J f t � tl� �.-1V1 ..iO 0 r 1~ 44
.. JO., t7 ll t li err' 1 ,........N .... ....... n ra�i !tL � ln f~a1:et , 11 t1 i l1 le. s 1 or :r 1( t sub 0 ' if 'J 1 r ~\l f ) ed l mtn }' t Wr 1' . in C.ti.fli t 8 o~ �e ( . . f.'S 1 Coo } � \ � ~ar c� � t �5 ) t- ttar o :to :1 r � ui d to ~fJ,.y i !!}+0, 779 .1 7 ., th n or.' n 46
� � ' l' ' � 1 2l+L. 7 k dono ' itt ~ 1! 0 enll ct he b ill' ,,_ n 'r 1 1 0 ll~ao 1. t rt' t - or 's 1 ~ L1 Sr59/, Vol ., 6.,, on w1 b 'b t.: . 0 a, ff t n1 46
'.. 1 7 1 tt r jod 1 1 ~.1 1 d or ' h h �� 1. , 1 ?4 , 2 t 1 5r . c~ ..�.. ., o 1 ~i o ot (:1 l t ax :�>-:1� ' , ( v"�I�'\ �. d co 47
More in CTA Decisions
- CTA Case No. 5624 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 5624)
- CTA Case No. 151 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 151)
- AEGIS INTEGRATED LIGHTNING AND GROUNDING PROTECTION INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 10716)
- CTA Case No. 2785 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 2785)
- PILIPINAS SHELL PETROLEUM CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 8492)
- CTA Case No. 4473 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 4473)
- CTA Case No. 1530 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 1530)
- PACIFIC EAST ASIA CARGO AIRLINES INC., & PETRON CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 7668)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.