cta_decision CTA Case No. 17071707 1969-02-10

CTA Case No. 1707 (Decision)

...,�� ' , ~EPU BI.IC OF THE PBtLIPP...r !:f COURT OF TAX APPEA.Lf QUEZON CITY � � - J. 1

.. ' � l' U$ l.c: . lev t' e ... ' . nc � f i t 11 - r t t. .. .) y , 'rt, la t' ,, l .t v � b h 0 t in n ::1 , .1. 1 28

S' o;, .. c~ 17 .. � ) � � ��

� 1 .. 8. Jt ' ~ .X X :X., *H-2+2, 1n e �� Ut'l... � )' r- l 7 o1' t r -.-1. �~o . 1'0 ft-1 stien at 1 2'\"l:;""tt ..,, n';i� 1' '"' Jto'.ll-t~ )-'1' i J: t . C.h } 0 ~8 tlrt t ~0 � 0 . d n' J :r 1 1,' e ' .:!, 3 -0

� � t7 7 1?~ ' l ' .... 1 31

.) ,.... . 77 d ,1f t o. r ~�� . r J 1:~, 1 G' t 1" ~ h 1 ., . II (.'2�1 .. 2. :3 .r..,Or!<.,. nt n1. er ), ~4 - � u sub!d. , t d I) h Cou :Pal ~ or t r.z 1 1 1 ?e to Q ~ld- oa 1 '

J;BC:t Sl:Oli ... TA � 1,.$ , i' � 17 7 ' t .. !l- to g1ft ti l .. r tion t � '- gi t nt i. 1 r- ., 111 ,II. ( t.

I � ' �� � 1 t � � � � � f

In tbt~: el~ nt t b p~~sent to t t~an- sf~r- of �thtr ~� <w rt7 d n� ,t " ~ollowtn t c .. JJtt:n la concept i:md 'l>t cr rovi::~io ~ r rtio~ 125 . ef ou .;1rt1 Cod decl r1ng b t � &1ft o.r .. 3S

.... � � t11 � r t r .. 1.1. � 1) "

� 1 t !'1 t . tf h 1 1 1: r 1 t �b her � ; t� :~ ��00 �r D. ) d 0 Q banl:in t:'Q' 1 \l t no � .. �� ..iJI :tuas eo pr- �� r 37

� 1 t ... * to , �1 . . .. ) � 1� lild u t (3) lt~t in y ot � 17U3 , 11 0]1 . . 1? l..

* 1? l t { 1 39

� � 't1l1 � :1 ... r f 1 t ,t 0 t t ~et � '� .i � It sa.i� � i ti t 40

.. r . t .l �� 1t. f )� t of :ll (.,. ,I h1ldf t to tb lu� 1 1. 5 � of .th� �~ id thr ) lo �S,,7t 5. ,J n not �1 l+,J 2 , 5 � Ho e low r ai"l-"n'f. _y 1"i.Un b. l f b l titi n r ei . t olv i l t !� t1 .

1 .., t r tn t� 1 n � �

� nvol 'Q �. �:1 t tt� U: 00 . 't n ' 23, 19132, ar er, ... en fl b be � "' s c . - 11~ at n, tol o� h .43

,s r h n tt ' .. t n .l � 8 r n4 0 d l1n en ino .7 0. 3 � �9', . � Oi tl r � ' {t.1t tax 1 un~tt � 1 ntt , ~ '! ap �11 t c f li".k j 11 ' 1 1 7 J f t � tl� �.-1V1 ..iO 0 r 1~ 44

.. JO., t7 ll t li err' 1 ,........N .... ....... n ra�i !tL � ln f~a1:et , 11 t1 i l1 le. s 1 or :r 1( t sub 0 ' if 'J 1 r ~\l f ) ed l mtn }' t Wr 1' . in C.ti.fli t 8 o~ �e ( . . f.'S 1 Coo } � \ � ~ar c� � t �5 ) t- ttar o :to :1 r � ui d to ~fJ,.y i !!}+0, 779 .1 7 ., th n or.' n 46

� � ' l' ' � 1 2l+L. 7 k dono ' itt ~ 1! 0 enll ct he b ill' ,,_ n 'r 1 1 0 ll~ao 1. t rt' t - or 's 1 ~ L1 Sr59/, Vol ., 6.,, on w1 b 'b t.: . 0 a, ff t n1 46

'.. 1 7 1 tt r jod 1 1 ~.1 1 d or ' h h �� 1. , 1 ?4 , 2 t 1 5r . c~ ..�.. ., o 1 ~i o ot (:1 l t ax :�>-:1� ' , ( v"�I�'\ �. d co 47

Want an analysis of this document?

Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.