CTA Case No. 3871 (Resolution)
MWUBUC OJ' ,lJE ..BIL!PPI:V�, �. (;f.>URT OF TAX 1\P?t:.ALS Q\..-�..~1'1 Cl " ' ENGUET 0 PORATlON, Pati �oner, -v ra C. T� � CASE NO . 3 71 CO" I SIO ER Of I TE ~ l . - REV N �E, - R - - ponden.� - -~ . ES 0 l UT I c in on t e � o ion To Cancel 8 ev� n na itn- dta P ition� fi1 d by ~�-i ion r on Nov D r 0, 19 7 on h und hat a �� ss�:en for .a~ nd�d ficiencv wi h oldinn t x gai at n uet Cor- poretian, Maainlor Chr ito Op r tian ines, lnc., n u - izon Con r c Opera ions and n uet- to Con r ct paretic e invol~ d hera�n, h alraa y be~n th ubj .ct o a coepro iae e tle nt t n th v rtiea purau nt to Ex cutiv 0 d r o. i t'tioner peyin tt amouo f 1,1 2.3 .00, nd th Rinfi: no n cti n on the part f r end n , tr GR , l � 0. Accorn'ngly, 1 t h p ti ion o r vi w b dee a ithd I!Jijj con,i er d cloe and 't r~r~inat cf. 0 0 o. u 1 Ci y. etr anile. N ve bar 23� l 87. e ~~ / A . T ;JL~~ ar �idi .J dg ( ffici l 1 w ) COt� T T :.:. u t.;UI, 4G As oci at J u:f
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.