[ G. R. No. 39715. May 03, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 39715. May 03, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 39715
[ G. R. No. 39715. May 03, 1934 ]
TEE ABI, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLEE, VS.YU SINGCO ET AL. , DEFENDANT AND APPELLANT.
D E C I S I O N
J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________16th________day of ________April________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Cotabato________, dated the __________11th__________ day of __________October____________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-two____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed with the costs of the instance against the appellants
It is further ordered that _________the appellee__________ recover from __________the appellant__________ the sum P__40.00__, as costs.
More in SC Decisions
- [ G.R. No. 51592. September 18, 1987 ](238 Phil. 109)
- [ G.R. No. L-26419. October 16, 1970 ](146 Phil. 283)
- A.M. No. P-05-2021 (Formerly OCA I.P.I No. 05-2103-P), June 30, 2005
- [ G.R. No. 47435. December 19, 1940 ](G.R. No. 47435)
- G.R. No. 259968, August 27, 2025
- [ G.R. Nos. L-35668-72. August 10, 1983 ](209 Phil. 31)
- [ G.R. No. 88665. January 23, 1992 ](282 Phil. 322; 88 OG No. 33, 5368 (August 17, 1992))
- [ G.R. No. 230095. September 15, 2021 ](910 Phil. 570)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.