jurisprudence[ G. R. No. 39715. May 03, 1934 ] 1934-05-03

[ G. R. No. 39715. May 03, 1934 ]

[ G. R. No. 39715. May 03, 1934 ]

G. R. No. 39715

[ G. R. No. 39715. May 03, 1934 ]

TEE ABI, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLEE, VS.YU SINGCO ET AL. , DEFENDANT AND APPELLANT.

D E C I S I O N

J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT

This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________16th________day of ________April________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;

By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Cotabato________, dated the __________11th__________ day of __________October____________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-two____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed with the costs of the instance against the appellants

It is further ordered that _________the appellee__________ recover from __________the appellant__________ the sum P__40.00__, as costs.

Want an analysis of this document?

Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.