CTA Case No. 51 (Resolution)
A
REPUELIC OF COURT OF iXX MANILA TR "HILIPPINE APPEALS
STACLARA LRR Petitiner, 360
versus- C51 C.T.A.
COULCYR OP YNTENAL REVENUE Reepcrdent
E 8121154
0 D D R
The respondent ansesned sgainst the petition
cr the sun f 149.653.06 as deficiehcy sales tax
end surcharge for the period fron Apeil 19. i950 to
Decder 31. 39s2 Petiticer centested the assene
ment with espect to the su cf 349,37.75 nd sp
peeled to thin Coue fer a revien of the assen-
mont.
hen thie case was Called fer hearinge this
Cert swggested thet the pertier enter inte a stip
ulaticn ef f-cts net diaputed by the partien in cr-
der to sirnl3fy the issueo and te sherten the pre-
ceedings
It appeexs thst, uyca requeet ef ptitiener
tho cew wes ozdered einvestigated by respondent.
as a reault of which it ls alleged thet ehe perties
axrived at the cerrect arount cf toxes due fro the
petitioner," and, themefere, "there ie ne ere Gon.
treversy between the herein verties. Hetion te
uthdraw #iled by consel fer petitioner dsted July 11959.
YA 8 0
CT.ACASE N GDR
Fireing the motion far ieave to withdrw the
petitien fer review meritoricus and thexe being no
chlcction on the part of recondent. thn sene io heree
by grinted rlthot pronounceaent ns to cowts.
nnei
HanI Agugt 3 1950
R QMal annceiate Jdge nveH M t***++
Jufge.Court of rst Instance of Naniia MNTOEO Q ARZARES SA) JUAN PCU Judae CoureFrs Instence cf Manile
81
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.