CTA Case No. 3434 (Decision)
I / l1.t.i lJULtl.. OJ 11 f~ ILU Pi J<'~ ~~URT OF 1 A~ AP.PEALS -- lL4 .. ft ' I Y Tf IL � vr a- .� n lint � ---- -- x- � - - hi s an pp 1 t p y pl 1 , ~lv rsit,y f y' r - in~o ut lector f tnt rn 1 � 6, 592. S plus s rc r years 1946 to �n �total sum of 14, 11. h t have rr OUGly or 11 g � CO-l C y t. d f� nt t � s nt., ln he platnt ff v r , 1n n court, ( i �.. ith r 0 t paid � �a ~ y ~s ro f � nc , tho pr cti n 11 i t \S; th GU of 1 .~ � he co pla , or1 in ly f i y e p n- tiff n the our I nt u 1, 1954, t on un t is .., Ul.'t . s cr by the enact nt of epublic ct "o. 1125, a d pur� ;; 10 I
c���lSI � ivll -� � s 't ,.. 1 2 c rtif e 'W an � . - 111.- a! ion. aident I uca- 1s yan y� t0 & �tut n � o ner er � t or ally nized 0 <:or� po at1on 1 c �t � to o tai y1 1 ec � X � h ver, t n te lla 1 li Y� .f. y tut ende -,'). 1 � .. X � I� I a a ~k cr = on� toe rp c i div tJd nt hie ra d �- t ,. i Y n I.s tu c �a ntver i y nc n �v~r ! y � tt Q 1 yas. Ace o r 01 d cute 0 e rpor � t! n, t p inti f c rpo ation -� t f ._,. r niz �rhat t e purpose for leh su~h corp� oration 1� formed s to ive to the !lip o youth auch traln!n nd nstruettcn ch ay ake t o l� ~ ared to y exercise the rights and to per r �- char � the duties and o ligation of ~ , patriot c an uaeful eltlzen, t � corpora� ,, 11 If
��� - lSI � Cebu Civ l -- � tion w ll ta effor � o t � s � ~c 1 nt f th r chnr ct � d an of Int rn 1 con� tax lla 111ty f to 19 � th rd to - co o t x exe vr 1 6 on e l 1nt f ot nt1tl to th p.r!Jaar ly fo und r ctl n 27 ) f th Y. tM nefit of de fen i% platr.tt f � t ur 0 .an ntereatc. � f h c t x o, u urc r 1 � i7 , 604. 77 194 .7 �� � �� � ' 7822 [) c r 17, 1951 1, 4, 60 . 77 2 ( X� ) r y � 1952 , 60 . 77 57972 ( ) pril � 1 :.>2 11.31 ~79 2 ( " � } y � 52 ot,t, ��� �� ���� ,, 12 I'
�� 13
- c ���I S !c. 1v 1 -- he nt e ch a. h l2 � ry J d cial c=t!o an � r y for 0f a:rc . 1, t o- cr axe f 0 sc d , an ;iuri ctlon v X' t � th n' pl tt � �� t u �- Xi in 1 0 y- 1, � 11 ct n of ln � juri t 'X cy .Y� A (o c � l , t } In f t.h :l'8 est f r �f~ u ic el t n fo t recovery o uy 29, , 60 ��� 2 � uy , 1 � � Ct t ay a I�
- iv 1 ..-3434 - 6� u vd 1 al l y, are of t in." on h � t c rt � of et1 () h d � l� ni 1: rf tn for roc n �� day, �1 � ourt c 1n � ' � 7 (;b a P n er r n 7( t t. p f l nt r n � hp 27 ( ) o the Tax 6 ro t pa tax because t corpora ion or anl&e enca operate ex 1 ~1 y � r ,, 15 14
- � u i vll � - 3434 - 7- �due t o 1 ~po � and no t o ts net e !nur to t b~n f t of ny pr v t s ckholder or 1rut1Y duel. t cont:r y , th d f d t cl s -~ rof � nd �t hat t pl� org n earnin nu � th n f ...t ts r nt, t ns Vicent � G l a � df n that the ff ot X pt fro. th p n of !nco t x. , In sup ort f b t t th pl t f or antt� fo prof t , t nd t tl faet t h t tn plaln �f � a 0f tn t re � o prov on o t f ect t t t � prof t or en tat .o , end th t alt ou h t p as lrat or n z 19 � d accor t tu scr rt o .r ar fl t .. h eorpor t n r. on- rof '" or z .. t1on o s n t c nv rt �t nto cor poration. v ctor on hould b cl s #f a ~f t or no � Pr t h ch r re tre y 1 corporatlo , rd 0 t ..,.. , � � o. L� 4, 1954) v- for pr - t ��� 1� � � , :t a en a n f t for diatr ut n n its stockho der � ( ollect r IP 16 1'3
. �a- Yt . V. � � ue t o l C rp r t � 247..., � In th t � � c ory p r.1 1 of t rtJcl f inc o o::- t1 n of h p~a t � ..f orpo at n \� uld re�dil y shew th t � t w s or r1 zed f r due t 1 rpos � ~n no oth r p�rpo � lcl. r v r , t � plaint f or on c nd the m r he D .t r � no C' .�.�. r tin, . !on to toe t ,.ts c nn to th u pt on . ct � o 27 ) t rn 1 on. t on o f t nt ff cor r t n n 1 1 not t S'tOC old r .... ach t I' p �nte.: t f th stockh lda.r d c t 1 ~f t c orpor tio, ic nt r $t v nt v n f .o c r- !) \; r i t n on ,f en r yt def n to plc nt �fi ' s <' -1 d r c � of r nt 1 4 l.neo t t 1nv Gt nt~ n other chc;; 1 lvc in � od, n, on an � u ty s n ln lc pl ' rof t lng p rp � � r , lcent 1$ ati t c- I ~- 17
�� !.SI iv l -- t r!l xpl i n d h t the ull as Col ii u s nut wn d y th pl � t �.f t r r nt ~as p~!d for ts uG nt to h~ o ner h r ~f . And s to the alleg d nv st . nt �n ot cho l!l, "'t ear9 t hat the pla "n iff doe$ not 'In n st n tho. but the s xe su rv d/or o� ned y t n s Vicente ~ lla$ (t. 5. n. pp. 45- 48). / ot ler r gu y t n nt s that all t he pr of t , rplus s ~ pr 3f � the pla int ff l l v ntu 11 o o tr. es dant , � Vicen 11 ho r ct e l y o n t n v r ty, upon exp t 1on of t c r orat x s enc � n u;ust 2~ . l l . h s ar gu t nt h lr y bo n n d t~ upre c ourt �n th c f oll ctor o �ntern 1 evenu vs . ' � ~. ncv E ~c tlonal C r Dt qn , 3 � 24 , 1/ :. 18
I tv 1 � - � 1 on�ety o rp s� ts t c allen ed. � � for� o 9 cons!aera� tiona, the pl ln ' f � J r by d cl (:! t fro the pay:ne t "f nco r .. c on '27 ( i�F the at na n od � d th n� ant 1� or G pl t . ""f l. l r pr CO! X rron usly y th d nt. ih .x sseac- nts i.s d fen nt er t year D 19 unt of c usiv of I.d ar h�~� y clare u 1 vo d , ' t� ut n �� !) co t � � , J nu y 22, l � 11 � 111 p ;' . 19
More in CTA Decisions
- ORMAT LEYTE COMPANY, LTD. v. PROVINCE OF LEYTE and LORETO B. BALAIS in his Capacity as the Treasurer of The Province of Leyte(CTA Case No. AC-95)
- JARDINE LLOYD THOMPSON INSURANCE BROKERS, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 8273)
- PHILIPPINE AIRLINES, INC. (PAL) v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE and COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS ( Consolidated with Case No. 7713)(CTA Case No. 7665)
- PILIPINAS SHELL PETROLEUM CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 6624)
- LAPANDAY FOODS CORPORATION (formerly merged with MALALAG VENTURES PLANTATION, INC.) v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 2181)
- PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES v. ALMAN GAYATIN, ANDY CHUA, JIMMY CHUA AND JOHN DOE(CTA Case No. O-684)
- CTA Case No. 4249 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 4249)
- CTA Case No. 3702 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 3702)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.