LAFARGE HOLDINGS (PHILIPPINES), INC v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Republic of the PhiliPPines COURT OF TU APPEAlS Quezon Citv SECOND DIVIS/OII LAFARGE HOLDINGS (PHILIPPINES), CTA CASE NO. 6874 INC. (Formerly Blue Circle Philippines, Members: Inc.), Petitioner, -versus- CASTANEDA, JR., Chairman UY, and PALANCA-ENRIQUEZ, 11� COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL Promulgated: REVENUE, JUN 15 2005 ~~~~~ Respondent. x----------------- - -- ------------------------------------- x RESOlUTION Finding merit in petitioner's "Motion to Withdraw Petition for Review" filed on May 9, 2005 on the ground that respondent has already issued his "Final Decision on Disputed Assessment" on April 11, 2005 declaring that the administrative case is considered closed as petitioner has already paid the assessed deficiency taxes as duly validated by authorized payment acknowledgment receipt with payment transaction nos. 268044, 268046 and 268049 and BIR deposit slip, pursuant to Section 2, Rule 17 of the 1997 Rules of Civil Procedure, as amended; the motion is granted. WHEREFORE, petitioner's "Motion to Withdraw Petition for Review" is GRANTED and the petition is hereby deemed withdrawn. SO ORDERED. ER~.UY ~~c_~~Q Associate Justice ' iuANiTo c. cAsTANEd�iR: Associate Justice {}.__,~~'~ OLGA PALANCA-E~IQUEz Associate Justice
More in CTA Resolutions
- SUN LIFE FINANCIAL PLANS, INC., v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 8821)
- CTA Case No. EB CRIM-82 (Resolution on MR)(CTA Case No. EB CRIM-82)
- CTA Case No. 2032 (Resolution)(CTA Case No. 2032)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. ORIENTAL ASSURANCE CORPORATION(CTA Case No. EB 1881)
- BUREAU OF INTERNAL REVENUE represented by COMMISSIONER KIM S. JACINTO-HENARES vs. HON. LEILA M. DE LIMA in her capacity as SECRETARY OF JUSTICE, GEORGE ERWIN M. GARCIA(CTA Case No. EB 1694)
- PILIPINAS SHELL PETROLEUM CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 11086)
- CTA Case No. 2356 (Resolution)(CTA Case No. 2356)
- GALEO EQUIPMENT CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 9486)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.