[ G. R. No. 39560. May 16, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 39560. May 16, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 39560
[ G. R. No. 39560. May 16, 1934 ]
GREGORIO ATIENZA, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLANT, VS. ENRIQUE BAUTISTA, DEFENDANT AND APPELLEE.
D E C I S I O N
J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________30th________day of ________April________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Laguna________, dated the __________6th__________ day of __________January____________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-three____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed in all its parts, without special pronouncement as to costs.
It is further ordered that __xx__________xx__________xx__________ recover from __xx__________xx__________xx the sum of P__xx__ ,as costs.
More in SC Decisions
- [ G.R. No. 208251. November 10, 2020 ](889 Phil. 823)
- [ G.R. NO. 153514. June 08, 2005 ](498 Phil. 709)
- G.R. No. 179195, October 03, 2011
- [ G.R. NOS. 169295-96. November 20, 2006 ](537 Phil. 549)
- [ G.R. No. L-26146. October 31, 1969 ](140 Phil. 549)
- [ G.R. No. 114418. September 21, 1995 ](318 Phil. 592)
- [ G. R. No. 18636. September 28, 1922 ]
- G.R. No. 141285, July 05, 2001
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.