[ G. R. No. 39173. May 25, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 39173. May 25, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 39173
[ G. R. No. 39173. May 25, 1934 ]
FERNANDO RUSTANT, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLEE VS. EMETERIO BARCELON, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, GONZALO ENRIQUIEZ, DEFENDANT AND APPELLEE.
D E C I S I O N
J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________27th________day of ________April________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Manila________, dated the __________15th__________ day of __________November____________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-two____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed in all its parts with costs against the appellant.
It is further ordered that ____________the plaintiff-appellee__________ recover from __________the defendant-appellant__________ the sum of P__40.00__, as costs.
More in SC Decisions
- [ G.R. No. L-31642. October 28, 1977 ](170 Phil. 157; 74 OG 1709 (February, 1978))
- G.R. No. 143643, June 27, 2003
- [ G.R. NO. 121920. August 09, 2005 ](503 Phil. 696)
- [ G.R. No. 15902. March 08, 1920 ](G.R. No. 15902)
- G.R. No. 141400, September 06, 2001
- [ G.R. No. 114172. August 25, 2003 ](456 Phil. 732)
- [ G.R. No. 190529. March 22, 2011 ](661 Phil. 427)
- [ A.M. NO. 2005-18-SC. April 19, 2006 ](521 Phil. 500)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.