CTA Case No. 3595 (Resolution)
. - '�r�":r� : LS . ..... 1' FILIN Vl!.wT 1 .D I Cv. Lt TE.D , C. '1 . � CAw � �v . 3595' f' e ti tioner, - ru � . pondent � X� - ~(JLUTiul cting on the tJoint 1-to tion To Pi rni ' til d by the parti s on pril 10, 19ti7, through their r spectiv c sal, informing this co rt that the as e sment for de1'1ci ncy incom tax 1d surt x involv h in h d re dy b th ect of co ro 1 e s ttl nt pur u .t rd r o . 44, it titi n r p yin the t of 111,535.90, tt. s d otion is her by G ~ D. pray d tor, 1 t ti is cas be is issed d th me conoi r d clos d and t in t d . u zon ity, 19 7. ll r.:
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.