[ G.R. No. 4284. February 13, 1908 ]
[ G.R. No. 4284. February 13, 1908 ]
G.R. No. 4284
[ G.R. No. 4284. February 13, 1908 ]
UNITED STATES, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLEE, VS. MARCELO DE GUZMAN, DEFENDANT AND APPELLANT.
D E C I S I O N
WILLARD, J.:
"ESTAFA;" SUFFICIENCY OF EVIDENCE.—From the Court of First Instance of Pangasinan. The accused was charged with estafa committed in the course of a business transaction with one Tarn Gamco. The contradictory evidence of the two witnesses for the prosecution held insufficient to show the nature of the transaction between the parties and consequently insufficient to establish the guilt of the accused. Judgment reversed; defendant acquitted.
Per Willard, J.
For appellant: W. H. Bishop. For appellee: Attorney-General Araneta.
More in SC Decisions
- G.R. No. 107801, March 26, 1997
- [ G.R. No. 109113. January 25, 1995 ](310 Phil. 549)
- [ A.M. No. 23-04-15-SC. July 01, 2025 ](A.M. No. 23-04-15)
- G.R. No. 237582, June 03, 2019
- G.R. No. 174658, February 24, 2009
- [ G.R. No. 260374. June 28, 2022 ](924 Phil. 201)
- A.M. No. P-05-1952 (formerly OCA IPI No. 03-1602-P), July 08, 2005
- [ G.R. No. L-48510. October 17, 1980 ](188 Phil. 371)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.