CTA Case No. 1399 (Amended Decision)
REPURT.TC OF THE PHILl 'PIN .8 OQU h. Y' TAX APPEALS QUEZON CITY cToA.L,ISI -c.,ILAY LLI l~!Jt titioner, J) I 1 - v rsu - Cl \rvu-.pf C. � � C E 0 � 1399 11+06 IO 0 L ' R p nd nt. X- � - ~ � - - ~ - - � ~- X D D CI IO tition � ~ r eo sid r tion of th d ei- sion in he bove- e~ t. tl d e s r nd d on D e b r 29, 1965. In th said ~ ci ion, p tition r w order to pay respo dent th r at ount o 219 ,399.91 a d fie ency inca t for t y r 957 to 1961. owever, i ha 6n shown to t tistaction of the Court th t a t he tic l error in t copying of the figur s and i n t h c putation h ve b in dv r- tent y eo itt d. erefor , th co put tion 1 h r by nd d s ollow 1 dedta inUcnalleowp blr dtudrnue-t-io-n--: ------- 81+6,131.97 ( ) Depreciation - 46 4 4 jus-~-~n--t~------~-------------------------~- ... ... Total ~r~~~~~~ t inco ~ Inco tax du th reon ----------- Lesss ount already asses d ---- --~~~~~ D ICIE C TAX D ---------- ...., ...,.._.-.. 27
DED D CI IO C. T�� C S 0 � 1399 406 .- 2 - ill�. turn ---- -~------ 1,~ . 634. 33 et 1neo 331,)16. 54 ddt Unal 46,24-1.4-1 (1) (2) 778.85) (3) .l2Ql 1noo p r r 2, 021 9639.,10 nallowabl due 1 n t (l) D pr oi t1 n - 46 ,241. l (2) rtilizer� T nture - ---- { 74-.85) bit "L" il 28
A D CI I C. T�� C 0� 1399 1~06 - 3- 0 Less a IC 1957 ---- -- 11~2,,901 � 19,17 .� co 95 -------- 19,03 13, 650,Q 1959 - - -- -- -- 19 0 -------- D 791 0J;t. oo 1961 -------- OT L OU COLLECT I i th ard o our , 1 OL t �ation of pres- cription or th y 195? d uetibi ity of th bonu s of th J ir c o zucar r 1 t w fin no 1 0 d 1a. .th oofrv � h r by ord r d r sp d nt th o 79 , 031. 00 a de 1e1 cy in- c e tax or t he 957 to 1961, plus th corres- p0 Sec io 5l(d) of th e- v nue Co � d ficiency tax 1 not � id in tul w1 hi thirty (3 0 I 0 th d t th1 cl. aion bc 1 tor , pet1t1 sure ot f i r c t <5 ) of he unpaid ount, plus in r .t t r t ot c t (1 ) nt , co put d tro th at th1 d i ion a in 1 til p, 1 � .rov1d t t t axi ount b col t a t r t shal not xce d th ount ,. 2 9
-- r r pon i n to per iod <> hre (3) y r � 1th- out p o c s t co ts . � ' zo C1 t y, ~ r ch 966. � ?u u � 11 30
More in CTA Decisions
- CORPORATE INVESTMENTS PHILIPPINES, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 6549)
- PHILIPPINE PHOSPHATE FERTILIZER CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 5523)
- CTA Case No. 3405 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 3405)
- RHOMBUS ENERGY, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 7711)
- BRYAN M. TORREGOSA v. REGIONAL DIRECTOR BUREAU OF INTERNAL REVENUE, DAVAO CITY REVENUE REGION 19(CTA Case No. EB 2520)
- PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES v. ANTONIO M. TALAUE (74-EAST MAYA ST., PHILAM HOMES, QUEZON CITY) , LEANDRO ANTONIO M. TALAUE (74-EAST MAYA ST., PHILAM HOMES, QUEZON CITY), HANNAH AILEEN LIM FERNANDEZ (1166 M.H. DEL PILAR ST. COR. ARUIZA STREET, ERMITA, MANILA), ANALYN G. FERNANDEZ (32 BLK. 14, LOT 18, PH-3-C, KAUNLARAN VILLAGE, CALOOCAN CITY), ANGEL T. DERAY, JR. (EAST MAYA DRIVE, PHILAM HOMES QUEZON CITY AND/OR RM. 603, S&I BUILDING, 1500 ROXAS BOULEVARD, ERMITA, MANILA), AND MEYNARDO B. BANAYO (G/F LA CORONA HOTEL, 1166 M.H. DEL PILAR ST., ERMITA, MANILA)(CTA Case No. O-273)
- JOYLAND INDUSTRIES CORPORATION, Duly Represented herein by its Authorized Representatives, Ms. Ria A. Sablon and Mr. James O. Yu v. THE COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE (CIR), BUREAU OF INTERNAL REVENUE (BIR)(CTA Case No. 11269)
- NES GLOBAL TALENT LIMITED v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 9065)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.