CTA Case No. 956 (Decision)

rl / .. E ... v ... ,. � . c ' - ... ._ ... .. - - 4111111 ... �X ~f~ i� )-~\ ; �� � � �7 . --- - D , �� i c i - of 1 � e - .. l r nn l 1 t 1- .. 1, 31 0 y 117 � � h f .�

- � " I �1 ippin �nc... c1 oi � 1. n� i -n in f 7� i 0 t ion t 1 t ... i - f th ' t n ! ... n & m� th t) 11 et y l VI () .. pt h t e tin th t onrl f h ta 0 n .. .tn 1 f Ii ol � i 31 l ud ri ary ju t on � DO e $ � o� to ua o ps nt ft s t p t tion � ~ r.t 1. Conrrre ne fe ti ie 11c .et t;o . , a. nq ot tr t in for ion f t.tn t X 0 ui d fro th �i ho 9 dAt.ory Act v!rle th�t i 1 ke ef oct upo it P .)!'OV l. -- -- -�-

� io s C�t new. ln ..,fmil :r c .aes, trw lvl 1 11 t arne h~ld th., n ,.., ft p ion 0 a .u 11 f e if he p ovision of on . f id man tory _,et in -~ rg th to 0 his u' ti liz tion co :t'c:C .. \_ II .11 th 0i t1tion r ec dit1 J ref re, ~, of in- 1n h i the m 0 ~ - 225

.- I ~ ! .1 1 'I I "l ! �~ j �- - L _ - -

I . I! 1 �J � ... � � I' 227