COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. AMKOR TECHNOLOGY PHILIPPINES (P1/P2), INC. (Formerly AUTOMATED MICROELECTRONICS, INC.)
Republic of the Ph ilippines COURT OF TAX APPEALS Quezon City EN BANC THE COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Petitioner, - versus - C.T.A. EB No. 325 (CTA Case No. 6694) Present: Acosta , Presiding Justice , Castaneda , Jr., Bautista , Uy, Casanova, and Palanca-Enriquez, JJ. AMKOR TECHNOLOGY PHILIPPINES (P1/P2), INC. (FORMERLY AUTOMATED Promulgated: MICROELECTRONICS, INC.) NOV 2 8 2007 4~1J~~~ Respondent. X --------------------------------------------------------X RESOLUTION Acting on petitioner's "Motion for Extension of Time to File Petition for Review" posted on October 26, 2007 and received by this Court only on November 12, 2007 , the same is hereby DENIED. Pursuant to Rule 8, Sec. 16) of the CTA Revised Rules , the Court may grant fifteen (15) days from the expiration of the original period within which to file the petition for review. The fifteen -day period from October 26 , 2007 already expired last November 10, 2007 . The petitioner should have filed her petition for review on or before said date. Further, for failure of petitioner to indicate a compelling reason in her motion , the Court is constrained not to grant a thirty-day extension of time to file her petition for review (Rule 43 , Sec. 4, Revised Rules of Court). SO ORDERED. ~\SL- ~ ERNESTO D. ACOSTA Presiding Justice .f~LiA-N-IT~O <2.a.Y-~~6 ~ . c. CASTANE 1!..., JR. Associate Justice Associate Justice ER~.UY CAES~ANOVA As~~ustice ~~ cfl~_/;ssociate Justice ~~ ~~7( ~"q ~~ fft.p.~~A-ENRfdUEZ ~/ ~ Associate Justice ~-~X~ , ~ ~ (!) ~~J':;n~ '
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.