jurisprudence[ G. R. No. 38018. May 20, 1934 ] 1934-05-20

[ G. R. No. 38018. May 20, 1934 ]

[ G. R. No. 38018. May 20, 1934 ]

G. R. No. 38018

[ G. R. No. 38018. May 20, 1934 ]

PEDRO SABADO, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLANT, VS. JOAQUIN BELTRAN, DEFENDANT AND APPELLEE.

D E C I S I O N

J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT

This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________5th________day of ________May________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;

By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Pampanga________, dated the __________23rd__________ day of _________March____________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-two____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby , affirmed in all its parts, with costs against the appellant.

It is further ordered that ___________appellees__________ recover from __________appellants__________the sum of P__40.00___, as cost.

Want an analysis of this document?

Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.