[ G. R. No. 40146. July 09, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 40146. July 09, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 40146
[ G. R. No. 40146. July 09, 1934 ]
ANTONIA USITA, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLEE, VS. BONIFACIO MARIZO DEFENDANT AND APPELLEE.
D E C I S I O N
J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________22nd________day of ________June________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Ilocos Sur________, dated the __________15th__________ day of __________December_________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-two____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed with costs against the appellant.
It is further ordered that __________the appellee __________ recover from __________the appellants __________ the sum of P__40.00__, as costs.
More in SC Decisions
- [ G.R. No. L-23632. June 30, 1977 ](168 Phil. 119)
- G.R. No. 140512, September 13, 2001
- [ G.R. No. 207269. July 26, 2021 ](908 Phil. 494)
- [ G.R. No. 231508. September 28, 2022 ](930 Phil. 416)
- [ G.R. No. L-2189. March 31, 1950 ]
- [ G.R. No. L-49430. March 30, 1982 ](198 Phil. 749; 79 OG No. 11, 1522 (March 14, 1983))
- [ G.R. No. 91261. February 19, 1991 ](272 Phil. 85)
- [ A.M. No. 13-04-03-SC. December 10, 2013 ](723 Phil. 39)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.