CTA Case No. 1495 (Decision)

\.l!':PUI'JT.IC OP' TU:E PBILIPPINEI COURT �.F T.-\~ AP~.EA.I..S UEZOO Cn'\' - - ... � �1 5 1 r' n � - � C) .. ., �t ). �

.. � r � l 0 1 312

t x o 1 t 1 .port~d eop .r 1re s t.r.- fo G~d n~u! tor � t' 1t1on r argues , th~rc;:f'o:t � th t� h 'Ull r its fr tlChis 's bread nd l ""'e br e1n tn inC-1:\td _ Xfl ptio ~'e titton r cant tr t!l c p&~ tin� t a Dm-11 e in tb t -e mt"\t1on grant und r F ra r pb. 9, Part 1 o, of � c lo. lt 4 o h .. 11- p t1- 1tion 1 li 1 d ooly or ta aild th r pu 'l1e pl c � I nd necesf'Jar indus riee xe pt1.(Hl trom h c~ tens in x. lt ~h tlld no equ 11 e l~$ 1 fer- ~ueb, talt 1 t � '0 pt1o. d.er $ id .r 111 lH)1 c � i! 4 of th or f.;�:, ss:fcm. 19\. is ~ bl"O- der in Gecp, than h tax...exemption r.o 1sion ot . r-*J1llbl1c :.ct . o. 9C1 . .a 1n><1:� te tha lot ~t-1 tioner i not q,x nwt fro tb~ oomten tin t .. en c:.op }f!r w1r -. , transtcrmer nd in!iulator i tJor a by tt, to 11 e wttb th or this ~c par 1 . a a th 1l j su � t:r eh1 th ,, 3 j_ 3

314 <;� .

1 - �� � j 315

... � 1� 1 ' 7 316

d� .r 1 ... 1 - ' tt 1 0 ' 0 l r 1r r to Pr '1 8 i �� -0 -.t e:bo ld b s j rd ' i th /~ -~ U tr1 i � bC'I c !on tl 1 317 .

(v 11 -C a �r 12 1 $1) . �- io l �., 0 ' 1- n r. � 318