jurisprudence[ G. R. No. 38934. June 08, 1934 ] 1934-06-08

[ G. R. No. 38934. June 08, 1934 ]

[ G. R. No. 38934. June 08, 1934 ]

G. R. No. 38934

[ G. R. No. 38934. June 08, 1934 ]

PEDRO NOGRAVICENTE, ETC., PLAINTIFF AND APPELLEE, VS. SILVERIO POnTEJOS ET AL., DEFENDANTS AND APPELLANTS.

D E C I S I O N

J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT

This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________23rd________day of ________May________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;

By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Camarines Sur________, dated the __________5th__________ day of _________September____________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-two____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed in all it parts, with the costs against the appellants.

It is further ordered that the __________the appellee _________ from the __________the appellants _________ the sum of P__40.00__, as costs.

Want an analysis of this document?

Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.