CTA Case No. 2178 (Decision)
R. ; IC OF THE PliiLIPlo'l <E Gvt..; Wf OF TI\X APPl!l.AL8 Q(JJ::ZON y �' � 'l --. - I � 153
-u � , 1? t t � ��
!l:t onl$ 1 � 'W'u.a ,., � t t d to tttO Tt.llt .l*& olt.tli~ i wbcti~r or not f � ~36t9l+.).�6 , o 1.o ,~ o wu"' tt e �� :Jld, 1 de eti.J th �~ pO~- . iO ~� &%' S~ �aw ape Ue.. �le � c t �. qt~.e&tion n.:t !s .o r �ds as tollo. a: Ga ~ � 1. co t-~om .so, c t ~,t� ~.. ~ln o p ' U,ttt) ll)tl ,., XX ~ uu 155
t e I nco), '!flX R gul~..... oru.t, ~m l en.ttn.g tt p:r v1 lo s o�*' s ction 7(u) of th 'rax cod , M~ *: ~ l"'$a<l a.s i"oll.O'J!s 11
� n 1 �1 � � � 157
lG ~la and ott'JJJJ' raajo.r c1t t . s uouAJ.l t.lt-o ~Fl�. � t 1 - tt~att -� in ,�tileJ~ anti pro $1ttg $ u u . p!Utto c vce;re,s;~s ot wc;rld�Wifl~ rren� . dd t~ttm. �Stll � sam 't� it -dia t11 ts . �. ~d h� vor l d. - t1t1on.E~J.:t�;1 s , t o:J :!.e �t: pl~~~r�� tUl4 n . $ - f>1:4 an i . trt.. ~d � tb ~; �:l ppin~ at .. . br l t . o:t�t~.e a~~4 ~ we.tl.d. ~h ��~ - . 2e� "' �tn l'iQa _.d1tl~ "' the n, t . - . he� 1c , 44tt.ins d :t . . �'& �d 4 tl 'V rtllf; and ,~._"1 tal't'1 C' th e ~ at . int.:tu.rr ,G\1 tone~ 1$ li�~ .oftic � - a oa4. .tn tact ,. ) �i t1onu * QXil~ns a a .ad ~lu .� al..arl e f ~Q~~ ondea; . 1 3oufnal:tt:~ts , :eu1.t:C'7il~1 pho ~~ , o�t:1ea� r � �t , -tt � ":to(il~ , an<l ~tnftl� ens.;Js in th Op$r tier ttf 1~ 110a?ld . fte office � 1s - ~via . :t, t h ~etor 1 t; � t. s p~t1t!MQ!� � upws _I � ound ~14 ba � a dl1"eCt heat>Ul. 1n ��h~ rod\lo 1on o~ ~ltpptft� : in~~ . b VO!'l -~ d etc t. _on-e~ carmot li11ooatst to .Pl\.U..A.pp1Q t.~~ � -rt:f' r . of pet1:t:Wner' . Ute aaticMt oor, and pt: � q l s world w1 Gl(p n � c��-:�.i"}!\"'"" 4 �Wtel7 b � all .tat 4 t ,o $0 � item: QJ! e.1 -IS Of ~- ' inc in t .PWi pp:iB, � w 9 , Mt ~n l'i( b) f tb Na'tl01~ ~~~,fl&l R�v�nue. C!lld$., in 11 tlti.on t �o & ot:t.o.n 1 16 o � . , ,.neoN R ulnt-i , Jail~� 110"4' � d. cti. n o � r >le p rt of th , 15 8
? tal _. 1ts n�t!.fe 11 . 'Qt o ot ~�~--~....~�~-- iooauut to. tot ' .r1d ~~ ' 1M t -llltls '~NOlld wide n~e.llooab1e &zp'OM&a+ I ttl$ dtt" ion om "ho t,hi 3.-ppta.e ero$1 J: V _l: d 1 f t1 ton~.r� , _� w1 p tittooor'$ t:nil� ffieo, tes 1t1 (1, amo~ otb.e;' , toUOWett � C~td$J � ll and di � tr1tr.1t �. 1 ~raes, llGV$:' ta.. t~~., lll"tielat~ to � ost . c1t1 '. , n orld, ma!nt.E:l.ln oi'i"i-ottt 1n it a.JrlY. t e th ~ ' 00 ' di .d 'l� ()f ~ tt t frc it ~oe1.te w.o.t�l<l e-x,pen~~s to e,. p.dti~ alp- 'C)i.f1co on a �.ey to cour� ."/ ba 1 . � .t r: t 1n til' case o:t c1� ~d Co. � Ccr.- R vann � 159
0 � �o rit , l. 1 s 19 ' 160
- 21 1959 f 1c 1 1- .. 1. ('! � r 1 1. 1 1 r ' � � ' 0 1 ..u 1' I ii 161
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.