CTA Case No. 365 (Resolution)

PlEPUBLJC OF' TITP' PlllLlPPil\EJ COlJRI,. 01 l.\. AP!'BALS MAi 'U.A , ~� 5 I :t-/,3 I /.s- :r - ... r ty d t. - - - - . .. - - ... .. �X fhJ.S t � .. ( r' i ;4 tD t rp ... he " An- er f re n 1 f nt � t� t t th sC I' nj tsd ct�o ov t r o aai co t r la � pl ft rt "'PP r f cl �r: h ref f 4 .7 edl vr r t� t f ... t el en � s d' r ... th th 1 rt r l 6 th � � rth l� t p .1 13, 1 ..; at " y f f verpa = nc �se t xe 1 o2 an 1 t f$ .- f 9 . 4. d L: ~ f%8 � is f r th pe cv l � 1. T1 i ~C./ 296

. � n. 6 � -, . 2 - -' nt ~ 0 ficie cy fr c is t X � -' ~ th su. 0 �t:.1. l . 1 nett � � ll Xd t pr() uc p it on r�s arr lzal uri th In tr t y , J. , 1 57 �t t on r i n f 1 lth ecpon nt on 1: r y Q ol f t r f h f~ i f � no tion 'l nt tc nd, l � o� fd t () t fr v � y 7, 1LS r J: n y , aile � t ,. t.:- l: . t of ~ , 47 .41 I th t XAbl e y s 1 52 1 5 (' ) h rl � f- j t l tt.r of n - t d July 1 � 19 5 ,.. 4� l t> � Y� vcr, ot . v en ate e - esp ct v ly d t d /Ju u t and ~ 15 r fil y p tit~cn r th h " aid r ~ue ,,. h v 1 ed y ' n r nt t u t f n- n. 0 a e rs t $ 1 -p n n tio � I$ fti t n, t 1 c n ~ y 297

� .6 � - , tit! t t ct!on 7 a � 11~ d ' 0 .h t l actio it: iG j 1: icti .. - t 1 t t n th ta� {l t � in h t t.h ubj �ct tt r e .r 1n :1 tlll .er stu l v� ~ ig i l y nt. (2} tl $ j . c+..-� ter tGrela er t ily conn !p l a J ~ { ) t t inv lv �ercl � o s distinct nd. s - fr th tc ra din the inst n petit � on c ul ot ve in I int !nt: a to d priv hiJ o � � ~1 t t 1 her n ~ig t f every rcspon� nt to til e ll ailaole fense f 1 d ain t h � w ich r s~ . .., s. A 1t �t ta . t � coan � 1 � � h1a �.a.� n t. it i t e 298

� or th" s � !r .. . , !.. � �t.U f. f �t f i t � n rn �� �� e a ry ~! 9 9

, � l� .. J y ' ,. I Associate Judge ROMAN i. ~ UMALI concurs & di ssents in a separate opinioQ. -�-~ 300