CTA Case No. 2849 (Decision)

(r 'l 1' .t!;AU J: � :IJ y .. . -~ -.. � , � 1 f11 t tion tl � v , n .;� 1 � 1 11, l. 0 i t ~� n� y1 0 l .1 � .. �. c i u ' y th ~ .li -

� 71. 1 . �d t 0 ... l� h l � t �

9 i l t, , 72 � �t t � 1 .� i.e n by � t � 191 .� 1 � ' 1 t ol i ol 1 � ... I d nt e 17� c ' al 16, l 11 n 1 1I 1 ��t / '

'' .. .,. ' � f t u t1+ 0 . 0 .. 11 c � vi on t tb r in () f Ufi � � ft~ ~ nt t l�

- '- � i � � �f � l i i 0 th c f l' 673

t f ,, �� 1f!tl r i o. t .... or ,n.c t c r ... � ,... n� r ... ;u 671

�� t 1 '1 t � u 1 .. � ,e o., Jurisdiction ;; 1 � l 675

� .. ' l n � �� � � ) c l� 6? 6

. ' � .co 1n~1 h�~ I;) t1 0 cu om-s .... t 11 1 ht 1 ck � in~ " t .ttiti � ' $. c. . c "'~be 13� 1917� ~k/ f 1 o J.n . � . in if. g � 677