CTA Case No. 3155 (Resolution)

fll!*'tJBl.l<": 0 P ; Ht .-Jtlf.t1'PlN1'f ~OURT OF TA.X ~PP(AU ()UftOI" 0...., PHILIPPIN NKI G C POk TIO � P tit.io r. - v rsus - C. T . A. CASE NO. 31SS THE. O.Ml~ lON l 'tN ~v u � n spon nt. X~- ~- - - - ~- ~ - ~~X E ..> C L U T I 0 , ctin on he v rb l ion o r nt�s counsel de in op n co rt on s epte 17 pr yin f r th is is 1 o thi case t. ground th th e a nt for d ficiency inco v d h r in had lready n et.tled through co ro 1� upo by t partie � and th re ing obj ction on the rt of p titioner. said tion 1 r Y TED. ccordingly. let the itio for revi w b con r ithdr wn nd thi ca dee d closed nd uezo "-1 ty� tro M nil , ) nta be 23. 19 7. l 0 lJl JudQ 330 ...