[ G. R. No. 39454. May 15, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 39454. May 15, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 39454
[ G. R. No. 39454. May 15, 1934 ]
EMILIA VICTORINO, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLEE, VS. LUCIO MATAWARAN, DEFENDANT AND APPELLANT.
D E C I S I O N
J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________28th________day of ________April________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Rizal________, dated the __________29th__________ day of __________November____________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-wo____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed in all its parts, with costs against the appellant.
It is further ordered that ___________the appellee__________ recover from __________the appellant__________ the sum of P__80.00__, as costs.
More in SC Decisions
- [ G.R. No. 71412. August 15, 1986 ](227 Phil. 422)
- [ G.R. No. 70717. May 08, 1990 ](263 Phil. 831)
- [ G.R. No. 214939. June 08, 2020 ](873 Phil. 419)
- [ G. R. No. 33430. December 05, 1931 ]
- [ G.R. No. L-19777. February 20, 1967 ]
- [ G.R. No. 232649. November 28, 2018 ](844 Phil. 255; 115 OG No. 44, 12264 (November 4, 2019))
- [ G.R. No. 111535. July 19, 2001 ](413 Phil. 657)
- [ G.R. Nos. 218532-33. April 28, 2021 ](901 Phil. 129)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.