[ G. R. No. 39454. May 15, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 39454. May 15, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 39454
[ G. R. No. 39454. May 15, 1934 ]
EMILIA VICTORINO, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLEE, VS. LUCIO MATAWARAN, DEFENDANT AND APPELLANT.
D E C I S I O N
J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________28th________day of ________April________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Rizal________, dated the __________29th__________ day of __________November____________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-wo____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed in all its parts, with costs against the appellant.
It is further ordered that ___________the appellee__________ recover from __________the appellant__________ the sum of P__80.00__, as costs.
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.