cta_decision CTA Case No. 386386 1975-10-06

CTA Case No. 386 (Decision)

~( �..' < ;,.; ~'� . . . . _ . � .t. � � vt~;n; � '"' . a~ ,v A " ' .;..;L . ... J .J1 ' ... , ... - "'e"' or ant.. ' ..... - . . ., .. X . r: l J of : c OI.".< ~ "l' 2 t \ .'.1!I � 10 by i t Y 'I J l,/ 1 _., 1 i .. ' th' c i' 1!-: .. 0 'Ei .. i' 217

t ~' 1. "'"ij - ~I.,t:.:JW J,. ::, t . I J, ~ L'IJ . 3<.>6 3 e J � � .ro nJ an: '.� rk ru;1 er �o -:::s_ -.: l ... =ro e . f, .... ....� c~t.? :r�u;.,t;~~r to ""'.r' w,:a 3 x .:t;.n rut 1, .:.ts o~~l �r\.�l �r: . t �� '�!�!> � > � �J l'..~ ... .... A�c.l i~ i1- . ! .. 1 . ~ .. , ~. ~~...-.;.;...:..;,:..;......,..;;;,.:....-.....;,4;.ii~......U lt. "' . .. - 'II

i ..... ::.. .. r .0! � 0 rutb~�,. Y t.r e ~. e t ....r ir r��t r l- c r � ~t r ny v . slot;,e�'� t. � !':! �. � c ,,,. 220

ti) :.tv~�::�t. ~; 1 .. j.,:::..a:ni of �c~:w w:itt.~=::r::.i;.h�.m ra~:; r.ot

l ... " .l. �\.h - �:1, :., ,� ' . ]86 6 su~ l i oJ.u,: .s 'or rP. l () b~ ,>t .t .u{',, " 1' r .. ,. 'r pe , ... 1 3 :�r .. r .. t to l 0� r H of th~ 1- . .Lon t 1. AX 1. L i." in . np~ "' to t b ... tr . h re. rtl nt i" ~1-' l l lJ' ..v. t' !'t nd ( l..!ol . o� Int .. � nto t .l . ' 3 ' .... .I �� 101 : .I~ . u r ... n ' rc, , j ) i i "J:rl ro of ! r v fj' r:f tl 0 rioo 1~ ., \..... rl t5 r ir. l or th .o '':".15 t C;..Ob r "6 . . r.: ;h.o !0 � 222

7 ~u 30~ �i � , uc� b r � t � ~ 75 Lt~r "i .; ~~ 2 2�3

Want an analysis of this document?

Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.