CTA Case No. 386 (Decision)
~( �..' < ;,.; ~'� . . . . _ . � .t. � � vt~;n; � '"' . a~ ,v A " ' .;..;L . ... J .J1 ' ... , ... - "'e"' or ant.. ' ..... - . . ., .. X . r: l J of : c OI.".< ~ "l' 2 t \ .'.1!I � 10 by i t Y 'I J l,/ 1 _., 1 i .. ' th' c i' 1!-: .. 0 'Ei .. i' 217
t ~' 1. "'"ij - ~I.,t:.:JW J,. ::, t . I J, ~ L'IJ . 3<.>6 3 e J � � .ro nJ an: '.� rk ru;1 er �o -:::s_ -.: l ... =ro e . f, .... ....� c~t.? :r�u;.,t;~~r to ""'.r' w,:a 3 x .:t;.n rut 1, .:.ts o~~l �r\.�l �r: . t �� '�!�!> � > � �J l'..~ ... .... A�c.l i~ i1- . ! .. 1 . ~ .. , ~. ~~...-.;.;...:..;,:..;......,..;;;,.:....-.....;,4;.ii~......U lt. "' . .. - 'II
i ..... ::.. .. r .0! � 0 rutb~�,. Y t.r e ~. e t ....r ir r��t r l- c r � ~t r ny v . slot;,e�'� t. � !':! �. � c ,,,. 220
ti) :.tv~�::�t. ~; 1 .. j.,:::..a:ni of �c~:w w:itt.~=::r::.i;.h�.m ra~:; r.ot
l ... " .l. �\.h - �:1, :., ,� ' . ]86 6 su~ l i oJ.u,: .s 'or rP. l () b~ ,>t .t .u{',, " 1' r .. ,. 'r pe , ... 1 3 :�r .. r .. t to l 0� r H of th~ 1- . .Lon t 1. AX 1. L i." in . np~ "' to t b ... tr . h re. rtl nt i" ~1-' l l lJ' ..v. t' !'t nd ( l..!ol . o� Int .. � nto t .l . ' 3 ' .... .I �� 101 : .I~ . u r ... n ' rc, , j ) i i "J:rl ro of ! r v fj' r:f tl 0 rioo 1~ ., \..... rl t5 r ir. l or th .o '':".15 t C;..Ob r "6 . . r.: ;h.o !0 � 222
7 ~u 30~ �i � , uc� b r � t � ~ 75 Lt~r "i .; ~~ 2 2�3
More in CTA Decisions
- CTA Case No. 6002 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 6002)
- PHILAM PROPERTIES CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 8635)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. TETRA PAK PHILIPPINES, INC.(CTA Case No. EB 2816)
- NEW MOON HOLDINGS (PHILIPPINES) INC. v. THE CITY OF TAGUIG AND ATTY. J. VOLTAIRE L. ENRIQUEZ IN HIS CAPACITY AS THE CITY TREASURER OF THE CITY OF TAGUIG(CTA Case No. AC-340)
- LBC EXPRESS, INC v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 8309)
- BASES CONVERSION AND DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 797)
- CTA Case No. 4189 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 4189)
- DANILO S. LIHAYLIHAY v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 7515)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.