CTA Case No. 2941 (Resolution)
PRUDENTIAL BANI<,. C.:��"'. Ct>.. I. NO . 2941 Petitioner, C. I . A . c, �-'� NO. 2965 - ver us - C� . A. CA~E NC. 3366 CCMMl ~ $l ON!: R CF ltlT t.I<NA L RE~ENUE., x _ _ _ _ _ _ R!aeo~d!n~�x PRUDENTIAL BANJ<,. Petitioner,. - versus - CCMMI :.iS lOt~ E.R OF INTI WAL REVENUE, x _ _ _ _ _ _ ~e!p~n~e~tl PRUDE 'rl"'L BANl< , Petition r. - veL us - COMMl -3 lONfk ~~ INTERNAL REVE UE, X- - - - - ~ Re p-ond~ nt -I -- PRUDENT! \L BANI':, Petitioner, - v c. rsus - COM lvSI CNtR Of I ~E~NAL R Vi',NUE , x - - - - - - ~�!P~n~ ~tt rl E ~ 0 L U T l 0 N Ac t i n g on the .. Moticn To ~ithdr w P e t i t i o n s r o r R view" filed by p titioner on F~bru ry 23, 1987 on the ground that the parties h ve lready set"t.led 8b
RF..SC.LUTIO CTA c~3 S NO~. 2941, 2965. 3477 & 3366 (2) thee c ses ursu�nt to d Compromise h;reement exe- cuted by p tition r on JulY 17, 19~4 and CLepted by res ondent on Jun 11, 1985, nd there bein~ no obj ction on th part of res ondent: Th Court reaolv s, as praye for, to gr nt s id otion. Let the etiti0n for review b consid red with- dr�wn and thea eases deemed clo ed and terminated . SO ORDERED. l�uezon City, M tro Manila, lofarch 25, 1987.
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.