[ G. R. No. 40231. July 14, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 40231. July 14, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 40231
[ G. R. No. 40231. July 14, 1934 ]
VALENTIN DOMINGO, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLEE, VS. ANICETO SANCHEZ, DEFENDANT AND APPELLANT.
D E C I S I O N
J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________27th________day of ________July________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Pangasinan________, dated the __________8th__________ day of __________February_________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-three____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed with the modification that a judgment is entered against the defendant and in favor plaintiff in the sum of P500.00 with interest thereon at 6% from the 8th day of February, 1933, until final payment. Costs against the appellant.
It is further ordered that ___________the appellee__________ recover from __________the appellant__________ the sum of P__40.00__, as costs.
More in SC Decisions
- [ G.R. No. 45240. May 31, 1938 ](G.R. No. 45240)
- [ G.R. No. 910. February 10, 1903 ](G.R. No. 910)
- G.R. No. 123561, July 31, 1997
- [ G.R. No. 167058. July 09, 2008 ](579 Phil. 694)
- G.R. No. 189365, October 12, 2011
- [ G.R. No. 117680. February 09, 1996 ](323 Phil. 657; 92 OG No. 43, 7054 (October 21, 1996))
- G.R. Nos. 133923-24, July 30, 2003
- G.R. No. 189754, October 24, 2012
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.