[ G. R. No. 40853. August 18, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 40853. August 18, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 40853
[ G. R. No. 40853. August 18, 1934 ]
PACIANO TANGCO, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLEE, VS. EUGENIO BELEN, DEFENDANT AND APPELLANT.
D E C I S I O N
V. ALBERT, CLERK, SUPREME COURT, P.I.
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________2nd________day of ________August________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of __________Pampanga_________, dated the _________28th__________ day of __________August_________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-three____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed in all its parts, with costs against the appellant.
It is further ordered that __________the appellee__________ recover from__________the appellant__________ the sum of P__40.00__, as costs.
More in SC Decisions
- G.R. No. 127697, February 25, 1999
- [ G.R. No. 75028. November 08, 1991 ](280 Phil. 376)
- [ G.R. No. 210328. January 30, 2017 ](804 Phil. 543)
- G.R. Nos. 119350-51, November 29, 1999
- [ G.R. No. 2999. October 25, 1906 ](G.R. No. 2999)
- G.R. NO. 166116, March 31, 2006
- G.R. No. 248743, September 07, 2022
- G.R. No. 105827, January 31, 2000
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.