CTA Case No. 576 (Decision)
57 t. - - ....... ..... .. X D cI I I) c .. f t !1 � t "' 0 BO in � p ~m ... '. d i t y f 1 chi� t X t.s . inq h � t.rom Jun t 'i li ch I .1 -ri cip of e t i":. if">n!l I nt y ic 't ,., ...r t~l t� ::t Vi l t�� po� l' - t ' \>"OUl l ft.> ts crf �1 il X ~~, Vt )y� Hd y n to 'l t� "S :-,lnnt ,Jl ""'irt s i{ tl' ic .. ~1 n to vP 'Jt~l. f .'tion .... id 0n s C�l.' u no ....... '' vaiuu oi the �l c ic c y ~ e �,1 t - 43 .7 1.7 , t 82 ,.
.. �. !I ;r 1, .... 2 ... in~ "nr.his c. f . ill . co 14 . 7 7. n, 'ill of � ~ p.l t} a sure rga f .. a. &l "' t ",", ... ot 1 oi ;\' l , t .92. )4. F t t: n r c:c~n S.\.Qd th ass � �� 'I on ... u. 4 l l" po�d.n t. 0i tt~ 1. ,. :f ol i th 0 ct �n it PS.iJC',...: ~t ic pt nt l r! riv d .!'0$S e:lp s ..... t x. n e n .. .4 t. i ' {) .... 0 t c IS" ti< � h"' th f tn ... ws fa1r m e f ~h 01$ c n n ,t h v 1- u0 1d ie c u lly t hQ n~ n tltio \.I n 11 valir. c tiS �c:t.l '!: .. owned y th ~ 61", Q -41:.... �.$ . 0 !0 fr :r " . 83
� -- � t n n - c t r .. 1 c 0 t () 1 � � .. 0 v- � n .. i :to � � f n .a 4
,� c . , ' .' - .... 4 t� l en iti. ~ 1i th i l nt v lid. uch c:�s- , u:. tit Tie d riv 90 . i~J ~n (,{ id t t h' v 0 the fuel ;,nd t i ch�~rq d t.o th �~CO _p. <l'nt . �;; ' al..t 0� ice pl.1rt tn th d!.tcl ----� . r r t!~ s �..- - 1 ~q ct .- p t1- el � f)C t r:i 'Y ill .. p~:tt of :tt.'� g 0 '"" Q i t ti>Ubj.:. 4. 0t f !,.. fin it! ' r i b.l X tl fran. 0 �5 t l . 7 ), . lu t �f lat �n th f Of .c c�rdin ly . a.t 1 "'h um of 3 ?.. i f. thfl r <lte his c' eisi n . . car i 1. � . "'ni �� b _...---- !I 85
More in CTA Decisions
- CTA Case No. 6007 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 6007)
- CTA Case No. 1917 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 1917)
- ISUZU PHILIPPINES, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 6205)
- REGUS SERVICE CENTRE, PHILIPPINES B.V. - ROHQ v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 9907)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. LUDO AND LUYM CORPORATION(CTA Case No. EB 1559)
- SAN ROQUE POWER CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 886)
- LA SUERTE CIGAR & CIGARETTE FACTORY v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE (Consolidated with Case Nos. 7183, 7245, 7335, 7308, 7326 & 7267)(CTA Case No. 7151)
- KEPCO PHILIPPINES CORPORATION v. THE COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 1155)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.