CTA Case No. 372 (Resolution)
HEPUBLIC OF COURT OF MANILA THR TX PHILIPPINE APPEALS
IDNARK PLATZEA. AB. Fetitioner,
- varSS C.TCN372
REVENUE, CCLLECTCR CE INTERNAL Respondent, SefImmEH 3o,195F q1zo 15 9
CRDEP
The abeve-onticled cang refers to a tlatm for
refund or the anount cl fl.l73.0. allegedly repre- soating tnocne taxes withheld and peid by the Phil
ippine Engineero' -yncicute. inc.. on the retaingr
faes peid te petitioner.
At the cemmancepent of the hearing oi the case
en Decmmbor lU. iesB, ccunuel fer thy petitioner mani-
fosted in cpen Coust tnal his cliant is willing te
admit the cerrestness cf zeaponuant's assessinnt which
hao already been pale and chat he would in cue tire
fermaliy aak for the withdrawal ol his petitlon fer
review in iting. In efiact. on Augustl2, l959.
counsel far the petiticaer ftled a aotien to with-
draw Petition ier Aeview and tc Close Case on th
ground that the matter in disputo hag eiceady hoen
oettled anicably to the satieteciicn cf Doth partieo.
Fren such maniiesteticn, we take it that peti-
tioner io abendening ite clalu subjecz of tho prnoent
appeal ter the eiune ei the aauunt of F19.173CC which
wao paid under Ciiieisi necoipt aos. 55496o. Oll3l5
10 7
C.T.A,CASB NO. 372 CADYR-
2
nd 622290 doted May 9,1955, ay 10.1995 aa4 July
19.19t-..spnc-.vel.
Aa prayad fcr sy the petitioner. and wichoot
oujoeticn on the part of tm xespondent, lot tmo
*Potition for Review" iiled in the above-eatitlad
caae n Mey S, 19t7. be ccsicered as having been
withdramn and the caee finelly terainatud and clesed.
SO CRDENED.
Manile, 3eptesner 30, l959.
TesienGNdg0
C0 Ansoclece Judys HChan M OMneal U O Jy CTANO
108
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.