[ G. R. No. 38711. June 02, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 38711. June 02, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 38711
[ G. R. No. 38711. June 02, 1934 ]
CRISPINA DAGANI ETC., PLAINTIFF AND APPELLEE, VS. ASUNCION PRESNO ET AL., DEFENDANTS AND APPELLANTS.
D E C I S I O N
J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________17th________day of ________May________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Agusan________, dated the __________29th__________ day of _________March____________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-two____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed in all its parts with the costs against the appellants.
It is further ordered that the __________the appellee_________ from the __________the appellants_________ the sum of P__40.00__, as costs.
More in SC Decisions
- [ G.R. NO. 156503. June 22, 2006 ](525 Phil. 339)
- [ G.R. No. 251350. August 02, 2023 ](945 Phil. 116)
- [ G.R. No. 34020. November 02, 1931 ](G.R. No. 34020)
- G.R. NO. 167572, July 27, 2007
- [ G.R. No. 146276. November 21, 2002 ](440 Phil. 944)
- A.C. No. 10758 (Formerly CBD Case No. 11-3215), December 05, 2017
- G.R. No. 116486, January 29, 1996
- [ G.R. No. 52688. October 17, 1980 ](188 Phil. 372)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.