[ G. R. No. 38711. June 02, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 38711. June 02, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 38711
[ G. R. No. 38711. June 02, 1934 ]
CRISPINA DAGANI ETC., PLAINTIFF AND APPELLEE, VS. ASUNCION PRESNO ET AL., DEFENDANTS AND APPELLANTS.
D E C I S I O N
J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________17th________day of ________May________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Agusan________, dated the __________29th__________ day of _________March____________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-two____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed in all its parts with the costs against the appellants.
It is further ordered that the __________the appellee_________ from the __________the appellants_________ the sum of P__40.00__, as costs.
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.