[ G. R. No. 39534. July 17, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 39534. July 17, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 39534
[ G. R. No. 39534. July 17, 1934 ]
ISABEL ARTACHO DE OCAMPO ETC. ET AL., PLAINTIFFS AND APPELLANTS, VS. ADRIANO BLANCO ET AL., DEFENDANTS AND APPELLEES.
D E C I S I O N
J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________30th________day of ________June________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Pangasinan________, dated the __________28th__________ day of __________December_________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-two____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, reversed and the appellants are absolved from the cross complaint with costs against the appellees.
It is further ordered that __________the appellants_________ from the __________the appellees_________ the sum of P__40.00__, as costs.
More in SC Decisions
- [ G.R. No. 198967. March 07, 2016 ](782 Phil. 215; 113 OG No. 3, 454 (January 16, 2017))
- [ G.R. No. 119088. June 30, 2000 ](390 Phil. 253)
- G.R. NO. 161640, December 09, 2005
- [ A.M. No. P-09-2633. January 30, 2018 ](824 Phil. 761)
- A.M. NO. P-06-2133 (FORMERLY OCA-IPI NO. 05-2138-P), March 10, 2006
- [ G.R. No. 234052. August 06, 2018 ](838 Phil. 320)
- G.R. No. 170669, February 04, 2009
- G.R. No. 239584, June 17, 2019
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.