CTA Case No. 259 (Decision)
� ~-- - � -�~---- f' � v rs\.ls - ��� �9 e n nt. x- � � � � � � � � � M � �x EI 0 � Th1 l a ro c ion of r pon etc 0 rn 1 venu d Y n ... titio r � cl Ol 0 u of l ch p1 1- t or or 1 � c 11 �� � h 0 er .,r v1o 1 0 of 0 al f6rn ' he t r 01 y daught n iu s ... l 00 at ' t 1 io 01 Ii n 0 n k, Cal f orn a, � � � t 0 0 , ood n th � 1 i p on he oth r r s on n t at 7. 4 � 0 v r . d r } arin c:���� th .rt1 a a r 0 c pr emise v lu ion of the s et n the h1l pia 5 L"'l h to 1 au / 315
- � 29 of 2 11 6 . 10, hie was arriv d at �� ol l ow 1, l � 38 � . ~-------~ 17, 1 52, tr h l tat n h r c return , t r t nf h 0 f l on nd st t n rlt nc X urn , r- tlt er�s eoun 1' pt rl ' 19~3, nt o. t . � l no fr t � t�t t so u of nh r t nee tax u nd y bl n or or pr 1 22, � n cto r 16, 195 , t et n r f11 n ended estate end nher t nc t turn h ing 316 3
-
�2 n u u .. t 2 , th n nt , on t h as of ho ed eo pr no ro � t in h "l ppino , o th coll ct th at t ���������� 1 ,1 ~.- ���������� 12. 9 ����� �� � ��� 7 1.09 � � � � � � �� l � 2. ve.rp nh �x ��������������������� 2 � 1. 6 � � � f� r� � � � � � � � � � � 1 , 2. 10 � � � � � � � � � o 2. 6 2, 2� �� ��� ����� � �� �� � �� � � a� ������ ��� t 12. 1 nt n t X �� P L IE � � � � � �� � ���� �� �� �� �� h t u r s d n hi c a the foreea1d ev s r l. r cr not h of � e 1 t or nna ood t 11 1 f or t o p tax. ., . 3 1 8
-- � � � r or n t a educ lo of thoulcl e 1 o e&tat or purpose of h eata � XJ an � et er o nc t � pon nt ~oll c or - of ln �.rnal e enoe w a corr c i a � 1n ( altiea an inter at. fher re t lt lno IIU e pre ent ar r�aolutLon c ev r ot cessary o:r er to Ki e the C I on rl � On th firlt isauea 0t � tate o t � l te :ra nna 00 f.I fr t payment of he inh ritenc tax, the rovis co � taint in ec ion 22 ot the ational ~1 - venue o pert nent and y. tn t c � r, t ls uncon r v rt th�t the d c ent - ora nne ood, t th t c e / of he%' death, � a citizen an r al - funla , n t d tate of erica. nc he petl� tlone:r herein has prov d to t � aatis ct. n f ., 319
� -- it ouz thet th 1 1 of th ni � at �� 11 he tate of al� ornia oe a de�th tax o any c .aract r ~ r p et f nt ng1ble pezenn 1 prop r y o citiz n o t e 11 ppln no r ei in tn li�e ov r , this , on t le st tht � ec ni4e en l!f rn1� 1 in� l ath t x n 1nt n 1 l 01 l p.rope v � Coll ct of Int rn 1 v n � � ��� 1 1, un 2 � 19 J orton t 1., V � <.;o!lttCtOl" 73, nuery 12. l� ector 1 nu 1 emil o. 29 , 0 th opin on an r c pr e ity pr � vialona o .tlon 122 of t qu t d � te r in is ot fort pa. nt ' f tuX n r or not d c- on tt r 'y u. � � Ol.1%'t , f a vs. ct r 1 ov nu o. 1 1, d c:ld n un 2 ' l 5 ttat 320
� 259 � 7. X of 26, ��� 1n - t a.ra ~aM 1n � � enue, i o. 1956) � vall a t c � 321 ... '
ugu t 23. 1~:)6 , r ...... t!o r is r vi d u d nt not ce nd X r o r �n t u of .s.... , h v r . p tit on r v n r J.a nt r d or �r ot only p 1 1n nt o:a: tX u ut p 1 n ount n of t as o s nt o .Gt t t X y r.pond nt 322
� 259 to !a ully u� an paya le f~OM deceden ' � ��tate. n ebru~y 2, 19~. petitioner paid 6, 1. 46, ancl again, on ebJ:uaxy 22. 19.., , � � also - pa.t n. of 1 , 61.0. 7 , ~ � total � of , 572. 19 �� t � est t tax ,_,-.nt. espondent ita that these payments *te and �� cona1 �r� the .... in hla tnal ~ tation o t eatate ax. Aa a ..tt�r o fact, v.rpa nt !A ��tate ta t e � of , 249.3 � Cl arly :tbeHfor � t ti onel." no utl y o elay the payr.aent of x controversy, conMquen ly o urchar � ahoul osed an collected :r erJ (} ectton of th coll c ... ode whic h pz-ovidea for t tlon o the 1/ eflciency ' .' t ~~~~~~~~~rr~om� � Internal evenue, end shall � collected �� a p~t of the tax, at tbi ra � o 1x per centua per ann f~c. the ue date the tax to the ate t � deficle y ....ad. � (Unci racer in upplle � ) It will � noted fr th pro !a1on o t.h ve hat th int rest ia lev � , ������eo and collected upon ount of the dtfi� ~iency as dete~lfted by t � olleeto~ o a 323
- �2 -1 van� � n f Jrt r . t h t t t '& to tt 0 h$ t ��t� c .., t coll c 1bl fro oses d ain~w p tit on r . r ry. and as ln lly oun1 d t in p en � th re as l:o y n ov rp y cnt of th tt tx n he az ount o � vine o "n r t c n eollectod n 1t n ncy. un o old tt f 7 1. ou-.ly ss ss d I ru t on J nu ry 10. pon- nt n fr tition r h su ~h s- nt nd t on nd rot yp - titio n on d - ro � In f ct , r pon n n u v �� or nt 1 . 1 ��tate x � Co pared Jlth th cane 11 � - n � hor 6, iff r of or t tn ide prop r � If con- 0 th s Y. 0 lt � 11 . c nt of anu y 1 � t 1- nation o h ficie cy - aeaa ..n w oul y1 1 c or ~I
� 259 - 11 - c f. rat � o o oth 1 al ac:t o o put in a �t p o ppr al on r ..- r� po nt. t0 ax Cod �� 1 9 1 o... �ty 0 t.l n� �t c ll cti n o t ( ) 'l) 1.010. 1 t hich provide � thll �� � p i tio. z, 0 c � t ere y �� ate " � or any interest on sue f or 11r.y 11 � c ior. C2 ax Cod � no tt:r t e n !b c f n 101 ( } (1 0 th o al Intern 1 eve u � htr c unpat on lch t ontt ly int�reat c c � 'ollec � ll' h ref r oplll ou t lnte es n� cc rd c " 325
� 259 - 12 � wit law. (d) 1 ��� c enftl~y oan <)nly ~oll cte th t a au CC>n 0~ 1ty of t teJCp 0 U'l � i tOJ> - of Int rnal evenue nor thi~ �o r G& c p l t~� p t t� er to y t c rami � pen l y. h!a ha n ur co s1 te t rul A e 1 ..0 !n A loo !line f � Coll c 0 tnter al ev�nu � . 1 �� C��� No. 16, ep � 14, 19&/(C ntral /; 1.\:"' ~�l' arl c; v � ll ctor of Int�rnal eve � � ��� � 3u y � 1956J onifee o t f I ~rne ew � � C. T. A. C a o. 44, Ju y l , 1 a � 3a1 Ala! bU., vs. ~ta , . T.A. aa o. e , July 31, 19~ J r-�--"'"-C 1al v orp� va. olle~t~ of nternal ev nua , ~. r�� 218, t . ~. 195 1 lo ~~�\to on , Inc. va. Col� lector of � ov. , 19 6J t rn!t �� p0%'ation vs. Collector of � � Internal evenue, � � � � 2>1, " � 1&, 19 6. ) vm T t th he~ y eclare � t ��t t lr t � payment tance tax, but tJU � � J~t to th e tet t � c~nt o 1 , 1 .~ � l.noe t � t1t1o.er h s lr acy paid the ~ea ndant 1 her y ord�~ to r n o th ; l3
� 2o9 - 1a - tttione:r t � IU o 7. 411. 64 lth tnte:rea f~ t � date of pe nt . anila, 111 pine& , 4uly 5, 1957. aaoc1a � u ;� l concurs and dtsaents 1n � par� � opinion. 327
IU!PUBL!C OP' THE I'HILIPPINEI COURf OF TAX APl.)EAL.c;;, MANILA . - v r~lS- c. r.. c � 269 r nd n t. �VE � x� � � � � - ~ - � - - � � - x Icc c u:r - 0 . j or it t 6n t h reo t is c���� XC pt pt:::- on l pro r Y f holc.tln h n the decea i tl n t fr the ~ - �� � On t h .,..Q t ~ n i.nvolv ng th cation of he r .c :lp ity prov :a on I 1 2.2 of he I r ~t h in y c c rrin nd c! nt is her .ettin v. ct ..,...,. n� ern 1 \,( I ni C iv .1 o. 2 ~ . d c cd y hi pt... o r .l.. � 0 nc J.lc � ha t 1 1 c pro... t ) � 32
More in CTA Decisions
- CTA Case No. 260 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 260)
- CTA Case No. 4529 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 4529)
- SAN ROQUE POWER CORPORATION v. MUNICIPALITY OF SAN MANUEL, PANGASINAN and ELIZABETH T. CORPUZ in her capacity as MUNICIPAL TREASURER OF SAN MANUEL, PANGASINAN(CTA Case No. AC-256)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. TOLEDO POWER COMPANY(CTA Case No. EB 623)
- MCC TRANSPORT SINGAPORE PTE. LTD. v. THE COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 9045)
- DAEWOO ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION COMPANY LIMITED v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 8829)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. TULLET PREBON (PHILIPPINES) INC.(CTA Case No. EB 3016)
- J. R. A PHILIPPINES, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 6454)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.