[ G.R. No. 5864. September 16, 1911 ]
[ G.R. No. 5864. September 16, 1911 ]
[ G.R. No. 5864. September 16, 1911 ]
RAMON DOMINISAG, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLEE, VS. MANUEL MANCILLA, DEFENDANT AND APPELLANT.
D E C I S I O N
MORELAND, J.:
We affirm this judgment upon the opinion of the court below, laying special emphasis upon the fact that the defendant at the time he purchased the land in question knew the rights and interests of the plaintiff in and to the said land and had before him the instrument showing such interest in the plaintiff. Having this knowledge, he can not be said to be an innocent purchaser and he accordingly took subject to the rights of the plaintiff therein. Torres, Mapa, Johnson, and Carson, JJ.,concur.
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.