jurisprudence[ G. R. No. 38830. July 03, 1934 ] 1934-07-03

[ G. R. No. 38830. July 03, 1934 ]

[ G. R. No. 38830. July 03, 1934 ]

G. R. No. 38830

[ G. R. No. 38830. July 03, 1934 ]

ELEUTERIO MONSOD, APPLICANTS AND APPELLEES, VS. THE DIRECTOR OF LANDS, OPPOSITOR AND APPELLANT.

D E C I S I O N

J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT

This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________16th________day of ________June________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;

By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Rizal________, dated the __________6th__________ day of _________September____________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-two____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed. No expression as to costs.

It is further ordered that __________xx__________ xx__________ xx__________ xx__________ recover from _________xx__________ xx__________ xx__________ the sum of P__xx__, as costs.

Want an analysis of this document?

Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.