[ G. R. No. 41760. May 20, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 41760. May 20, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 41760
[ G. R. No. 41760. May 20, 1934 ]
LORENZO ALBARRACIN, PETITIONER-APPELLEES VS. MUNICIPAL COUNCIL OF ARGAO, CEBU, ET AL., RESPONDENTS-APPELLANTS, PEDRO FUENTES ET AL., INTERVENORS-APPELLEES.
D E C I S I O N
J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________22nd________day of ________May________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the dispositive part of the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Cebu________, dated the __________11th__________ day of __________April____________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-four____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed with costs of this instance against the appellants.
It is further ordered that _________the appellees_________ recover from __________the appellants_________ the sum of P__40.00__, as costs.
More in SC Decisions
- [ G.R. Nos. 74590-91. March 11, 1991 ](272-A Phil. 1)
- G.R. Nos. 145014-15, February 18, 2004
- [ G.R. No. 123639. June 10, 1997 ](339 Phil. 433)
- [ G.R. No. 181692. August 14, 2013 ](716 Phil. 352)
- [ G.R. NO. 81493. April 03, 1990 ](262 Phil. 930)
- [ G.R. No. L-44466. January 30, 1989 ](251 Phil. 544)
- [ G.R. No. 78282. July 05, 1989 ](256 Phil. 521; 86 OG No. 37, 6870 (September 10, 1990))
- [ A.C. No. 7389. July 02, 2019 ](855 Phil. 701)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.