CTA Case No. 2202 (Decision)
R! f' . \i !C OF THI-: PHILIPPLiF.:B l..IILRT OF TAX AP PI!IALS QUEZON c.r:rY -. � � � :� 7 7
- � 1 "' ,. 78 ..
-- () tif i �'rj 9
to . c a1n ��bat cont. tf)! \fit �& or� wll tber thQV w� �. in eomt'l. eial. (111$J t1t t t~t no evid nee dduc 4li'Hlt to sbow tba't � 2.01 e- so... l tf eta o.r co $l'Qd ,- WA"'/ tU.. Pur h l"'iw� mor t p titionor ~ ge t d ta1th. _. llUd va..,. e~tt d, h c ;. th ttn Qt : ,ooo.oo i. . rs . antl ta.XC~l$$iVe ar.ul p~tzyS ti"�llt ttw eam6 ~'G :.rf.tdU~ad. w. not oonvtnesd �b1 � .t tlo ' nts. Whilg it mq b!Ei tru tba pet t:ton�r had no o pot><tunity :r vt-1!~ !n 40lliDJ e.tal quanti or w~� b1ihl.Y dutl ble, t n. liSpU d l- ~t h l 1)4$:8 l t$ ;t> en, t~ Qr by ' ' ~e ~. t~ mutil w 1�;ht lo 0<1 ch ot h One ll$$&ngm- tr allowanct- b,y n:; <.leb as J,,).)O lb~i � ' Obvlou.alf� tba .. �tiel rou .ht by d pa.... &orz eu.n <! sid@ed .~l"sonal ef:tGots. ~Vft11 tho �nxttttl ,Jaa.. lon and s" M a - _ J t u J :e �1 1iS J ill! ; ~~ ' 8 0
- -- . t .......... l t 1' . s su --t~ ed t 1m ~1- r ..,' ..... t1 ' 1.' -.e .. l ..1t ur ....,h . .taw. 0 I t c j ... "' d~ ll 965i ~ ' l.Bc -. rs. � 0' � �� . � '-079 ,~�:iJpv , - J 1 12i � ~ tl.,:iG o. 5, 197\t.� ) ll 1 ., t ��. 0 f P� 1t.: t � 'll e . i' 81
-- - 4< .. :' Ill 1 0 :l 'V i t� or t 10 c .. �� jJ: c .a....!o pp . '"-0 . 1. ~r � "() � ' � .f.1 y � .s.... t 1 t.a . i' 82
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.